Click here to explore thousands of examiner marked IA, EE and TOK exemplars!
Sports, Exercise, and Health Science IA Criteria and Checklist
If you want to improve your Sports Science IA grade, make sure that your investigation meets all the assessment criteria. Clastify is here to help! Keep reading for recommendations regarding writing a perfect IA.
The sports, exercise, and health science IA contributes to 20% of your final score. You can gain up to 24 points based on the following criteria:
Personal engagement - 2 points
This criterion is demonstrated through signs of engagement in the process of conducting the investigation like independent thinking and initiative. It is suggested that the research question or topic reflects personal significance, interest, or curiosity. The reader should be left with the impression that the student well understands the different steps of the research and can justify their choices.
For a maximum of 2 points:
The exploration exhibits show signs of personal involvement such as independent thought, initiative, or creativity.
The rationale provided for selecting the research question or topic reveals personal significance, interest, or curiosity.
There are indications of individual input and initiative in the design, implementation, or presentation of the investigation.
Check here for inspiration.
Exploration - 6 points
You are required to precisely state the investigation's topic and a tightly focused research question. Provide background information to showcase your understanding of the investigation's context and your knowledge. An important part of this criterion is the methodology. Make sure that it takes into account the safety, ethical, and environmental considerations as well as the factors affecting data accuracy.
For a maximum of 6 points:
The topic of the investigation is stated along with a tightly focused research question.
The background information supplied entirely fits the context and facilitates the comprehension of the investigation's context.
The selected methodology addresses the research question by accounting for all, or nearly all, significant factors that might impact the relevance, reliability, and adequacy of the data collected.
The report demonstrates awareness of safety, ethical, or environmental concerns pertinent to the investigation's methodology.
See a well-developed exploration in this IA.
Analysis - 6 points
The analysis consists of data selection, processing, and interpretation. Remember that the data must be relevant and sufficient to answer the research question. You must consider different factors that could have influenced your results such as the environment of conducting the study, personal bias but also measurement uncertainties. Look for trends within the data and interpret them.
For a maximum of 6 points:
The report includes sufficient relevant quantitative and qualitative raw data that could support a detailed and valid conclusion to the research question.
The data processing undertaken is both appropriate and adequate, conducted with the precision necessary to derive a conclusion that aligns entirely with the experimental data.
The report demonstrates a thorough and appropriate acknowledgment of the influence of measurement uncertainty on the analysis.
The interpretation of the processed data is accurate, enabling the deduction of a completely valid and detailed conclusion to the research question.
This IA is worth taking a look at.
Evaluation - 6 points
Based on the findings from the data and scientific context provide a direct answer to the research question. Demonstrate your understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of your approach. After having established that, propose realistic extensions and improvements for the study.
For a maximum of 6 points:
A thorough and justified conclusion is provided, directly addressing the research question and substantiated by the presented data.
The conclusion is accurately depicted and supported through appropriate comparisons with established scientific contexts.
The investigation's strengths and weaknesses, including data limitations and sources of error, are described, indicating awareness of the methodological complexities in drawing conclusions.
Realistic suggestions for enhancing and expanding upon the investigation are offered, demonstrating thoughtful consideration for future improvements.
You can refer to this exemplar.
Communication - 4 points
Your investigation should be easily understandable for the reader. Maintain an easy-to-follow and logical structure, in which the introduction, body, conclusion, and their subsections are linked together. Include specific terminology and science conventions.
For a maximum of 4 points:
The investigation's presentation is clear.
Mistakes, if any, do not impede understanding of the focus, process, and outcomes.
The report exhibits a well-organized structure, effectively presenting the essential information on the investigation's focus, process, and outcomes in a coherent manner.
It is both relevant and concise, facilitating a clear understanding of the investigation's focus, process, and outcomes.
The use of subject-specific terminology and conventions is appropriate and correct.
This IA has a clear structure.
We are hoping that this article will guide you at writing process. For more inspiration check out the remaining IA exemplars and other publications on our blog.
Sports, Exercise, and Health Science IA Criteria and Checklist
If you want to improve your Sports Science IA grade, make sure that your investigation meets all the assessment criteria. Clastify is here to help! Keep reading for recommendations regarding writing a perfect IA.
The sports, exercise, and health science IA contributes to 20% of your final score. You can gain up to 24 points based on the following criteria:
Personal engagement - 2 points
This criterion is demonstrated through signs of engagement in the process of conducting the investigation like independent thinking and initiative. It is suggested that the research question or topic reflects personal significance, interest, or curiosity. The reader should be left with the impression that the student well understands the different steps of the research and can justify their choices.
For a maximum of 2 points:
The exploration exhibits show signs of personal involvement such as independent thought, initiative, or creativity.
The rationale provided for selecting the research question or topic reveals personal significance, interest, or curiosity.
There are indications of individual input and initiative in the design, implementation, or presentation of the investigation.
Check here for inspiration.
Exploration - 6 points
You are required to precisely state the investigation's topic and a tightly focused research question. Provide background information to showcase your understanding of the investigation's context and your knowledge. An important part of this criterion is the methodology. Make sure that it takes into account the safety, ethical, and environmental considerations as well as the factors affecting data accuracy.
For a maximum of 6 points:
The topic of the investigation is stated along with a tightly focused research question.
The background information supplied entirely fits the context and facilitates the comprehension of the investigation's context.
The selected methodology addresses the research question by accounting for all, or nearly all, significant factors that might impact the relevance, reliability, and adequacy of the data collected.
The report demonstrates awareness of safety, ethical, or environmental concerns pertinent to the investigation's methodology.
See a well-developed exploration in this IA.
Analysis - 6 points
The analysis consists of data selection, processing, and interpretation. Remember that the data must be relevant and sufficient to answer the research question. You must consider different factors that could have influenced your results such as the environment of conducting the study, personal bias but also measurement uncertainties. Look for trends within the data and interpret them.
For a maximum of 6 points:
The report includes sufficient relevant quantitative and qualitative raw data that could support a detailed and valid conclusion to the research question.
The data processing undertaken is both appropriate and adequate, conducted with the precision necessary to derive a conclusion that aligns entirely with the experimental data.
The report demonstrates a thorough and appropriate acknowledgment of the influence of measurement uncertainty on the analysis.
The interpretation of the processed data is accurate, enabling the deduction of a completely valid and detailed conclusion to the research question.
This IA is worth taking a look at.
Evaluation - 6 points
Based on the findings from the data and scientific context provide a direct answer to the research question. Demonstrate your understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of your approach. After having established that, propose realistic extensions and improvements for the study.
For a maximum of 6 points:
A thorough and justified conclusion is provided, directly addressing the research question and substantiated by the presented data.
The conclusion is accurately depicted and supported through appropriate comparisons with established scientific contexts.
The investigation's strengths and weaknesses, including data limitations and sources of error, are described, indicating awareness of the methodological complexities in drawing conclusions.
Realistic suggestions for enhancing and expanding upon the investigation are offered, demonstrating thoughtful consideration for future improvements.
You can refer to this exemplar.
Communication - 4 points
Your investigation should be easily understandable for the reader. Maintain an easy-to-follow and logical structure, in which the introduction, body, conclusion, and their subsections are linked together. Include specific terminology and science conventions.
For a maximum of 4 points:
The investigation's presentation is clear.
Mistakes, if any, do not impede understanding of the focus, process, and outcomes.
The report exhibits a well-organized structure, effectively presenting the essential information on the investigation's focus, process, and outcomes in a coherent manner.
It is both relevant and concise, facilitating a clear understanding of the investigation's focus, process, and outcomes.
The use of subject-specific terminology and conventions is appropriate and correct.
This IA has a clear structure.
We are hoping that this article will guide you at writing process. For more inspiration check out the remaining IA exemplars and other publications on our blog.
The Fast Track To Your
Best IB Coursework & College Essays
All content on this website has been developed independently from and is not endorsed by the International Baccalaureate Organization. International Baccalaureate and IB are registered trademarks owned by the International Baccalaureate Organization.