Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Estara requires every imported toy to undergo domestic laboratory testing and carry labels in three languages. The government describes these measures as necessary safety standards. Foreign firms must pay a fixed testing fee for each product design.
Domestic toy firms already use Estaran laboratories and are exempt from repeat testing. Overseas suppliers therefore describe the rules as an administrative barrier that discriminates against imports.
Several small foreign firms have withdrawn from Estara. Imported toy prices have risen, and consumers face less variety. Domestic firms have expanded sales but now face weaker pressure to reduce costs or improve quality.
The government states that inspections have reduced the number of unsafe toys. It is considering recognizing equivalent foreign safety certificates, which would reduce duplicated testing while maintaining safety requirements.
Toy varieties available in Estara before and after the safety rules.
| Toy variety source | Before rules | After rules |
|---|---|---|
| Imported toys | 1200 | 900 |
| Domestic toys | Not stated | Not stated |
Average price of an imported toy before and after the rules.
| Period | Average imported toy price / estaras |
|---|---|
| Before the rules | 24 |
| After the rules | 30 |
Define the term standard indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term administrative barrier indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in the number of imported toy varieties.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage increase in the average price of an imported toy.
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how the testing requirements may affect the market for imported toys (Text A).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how the rules may affect Estara’s domestic toy producers (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a market-failure diagram, explain how genuine safety standards may improve resource allocation (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how recognizing equivalent foreign certificates could affect imported toy prices (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether Estara’s toy standards are legitimate regulation or disguised trade protection.
Using a tariff diagram, explain how the imposition of a tariff affects the market for an imported good.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the consequences of tariffs for the stakeholders in an importing country.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Norland imports most of the steel used by its construction and machinery industries. Following an increase in imports, the government imposed a tariff of 30 norins per tonne of imported steel. Domestic steel production subsequently increased, while steel consumption and imports decreased.
Domestic steel producers and their workers welcomed the policy. However, construction firms reported higher input costs, and some postponed investment projects. The government receives revenue from steel that continues to be imported.
Consumer organizations argue that the tariff has reduced consumer surplus. Economists also estimate that the policy creates production and consumption inefficiencies because some lower-cost imports have been replaced by higher-cost domestic production.
The government is considering replacing the tariff with a production subsidy for domestic steel firms. Under this proposal, imported steel would remain available at the world price.
Norland’s steel market before and after the tariff.
| Steel imports / tonnes | Before tariff | Domestic steel consumption / tonnes |
|---|---|---|
| Steel imports [tonnes] | 600 000 | 420 000 |
| Domestic steel consumption [tonnes] | — | 900 000 |
Annual expenditure on imported steel in Norland before and after the tariff.
| Period | Import expenditure / million norins |
|---|---|
| Before tariff | 72 |
| After tariff | 63 |
Define the term tariff indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term consumer surplus indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in steel imports following the tariff.
Using Table 2, calculate the change in annual expenditure on imported steel following the tariff.
Using an international trade tariff diagram, explain the effect of the tariff on Norland’s steel imports (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how the tariff may affect Norland’s construction market (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how the postponement of investment projects may affect Norland’s real output (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using an international trade production-subsidy diagram, explain how the proposed subsidy would affect steel consumers and imports (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether a tariff or a production subsidy would be the more appropriate way to protect Norland’s domestic steel producers.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Bellara’s government has imposed an import quota on rice. Before the restriction, imported rice was available at a price below the production costs of many domestic farms. The quota has raised the domestic price and expanded domestic rice production.
Import licences are allocated free of charge to a small number of domestic wholesalers. These firms can purchase rice at the world price and sell it at Bellara’s higher domestic price, thereby receiving a quota rent.
Household groups report that lower-income families spend a large proportion of their income on rice and have been especially affected by the higher price. Some restaurants have also increased their prices.
The government is considering auctioning the licences instead. Economists argue that this would transfer the quota rent to the government, although the higher rice price and the two efficiency losses would remain.
Annual rice imports and domestic consumption in Bellara
| Measure | Before quota | Under quota |
|---|---|---|
| Rice imports / tonnes per year | 500 000 | 320 000 |
| Domestic rice consumption / tonnes per year | Not stated | 800 000 |
Average monthly household expenditure on rice before and after the import quota.
| Period | Average monthly expenditure / bellars |
|---|---|
| Before quota | 40 |
| After quota | 52 |
Define the term import quota indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term quota rent indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in annual rice imports caused by the quota.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage increase in average monthly household expenditure on rice.
Using an international trade quota diagram, explain how the quota affects Bellara’s rice price, production and consumption (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how the quota may affect the market for restaurant meals (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a Lorenz curve diagram, explain how the rice quota could increase income inequality in Bellara (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using the international trade quota diagram, explain how auctioning the import licences would affect the distribution of quota rent (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the effects of Bellara’s rice import quota on its stakeholders and economic welfare.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Costavia imports most of its solar panels at the world price. Its government has introduced a subsidy for every panel produced domestically. The payment lowers domestic firms’ effective production costs, while consumers continue to buy panels at the world price.
Domestic production and employment have increased, and imports have fallen. However, the subsidy creates an opportunity cost because government funds could have been used for schools or public transport.
Economists estimate that the subsidy creates a welfare loss by encouraging some panels to be produced domestically at a resource cost greater than the cost of importing them. Unlike a tariff, it does not create a consumption distortion while imports remain available at the world price.
The government is considering an administrative rule requiring imported panels to complete additional certification. Small foreign suppliers argue that its fixed compliance costs would make exporting to Costavia unprofitable.
Annual domestic solar-panel output and consumption in Costavia.
| Measure | Before subsidy | After subsidy |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic output / panels per year | 150 000 | 210 000 |
| Domestic consumption / panels per year | — | 500 000 |
Annual government spending in Costavia.
| Spending item | Annual amount / million costas |
|---|---|
| Solar-panel production subsidy | 12.6 |
| Total government spending | 630 |
Define the term subsidy indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term welfare loss indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in domestic solar-panel output following the subsidy.
Using Table 2, calculate subsidy spending as a percentage of total government spending.
Using an international trade production-subsidy diagram, explain the effect of the subsidy on domestic output and imports (Text A, paragraphs 1–2).
Using a PPC diagram, explain the opportunity cost of government spending on the subsidy (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using a labour-market diagram, explain how the subsidy may increase employment in domestic solar-panel production (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how the proposed certification requirement could affect imported solar panels (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss the consequences of Costavia’s production subsidy for its stakeholders and economic welfare.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Deltora is a small exporter of cheese. The government pays an export subsidy for every tonne sold abroad. Dairy firms can therefore obtain the world price plus the subsidy and will not sell domestically for less than this amount.
The policy has increased domestic cheese production and exports but reduced domestic consumption. Local households now pay a higher cheese price, while the government finances payments on all subsidized exports.
Farmers in neighbouring countries claim that subsidized Deltoran exports reduce their market share. Their governments are considering retaliatory tariffs.
Economists argue that the subsidy reduces Deltora’s economic welfare because gains to producers are outweighed by consumer losses and government expenditure. Environmental groups also associate expanded dairy output with greater water pollution.
Deltora’s annual cheese exports before and after the export subsidy.
| Period | Cheese exports / tonnes per year |
|---|---|
| Before export subsidy | 80 000 |
| After export subsidy | 116 000 |
Domestic cheese prices in Deltora before and after the export subsidy.
| Period | Domestic cheese price / delts per kg |
|---|---|
| Before subsidy | 5 |
| After subsidy | 6 |
Define the term export subsidy indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term economic welfare indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in Deltora’s cheese exports.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage increase in the domestic cheese price.
Using an international trade export-subsidy diagram, explain the effect of the subsidy on Deltora’s cheese production, consumption and exports (Text A).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how the subsidy affects domestic cheese consumers (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using a negative production externality diagram, explain how expanded dairy production may create market failure (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using an international trade tariff diagram, explain how a retaliatory tariff could affect Deltora’s cheese exports (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate Deltora’s use of an export subsidy for cheese.
Belesia imports solar panels at a world price of 400 belars per panel. To encourage domestic production, the government is considering a subsidy of 100 belars for every panel produced by a domestic firm. Table 1 shows the expected market effects.
Belesian solar-panel market before and after a domestic production subsidy, with assumptions for welfare calculations.
| Market measure | World/consumer price / belars per panel | Production subsidy / belars per panel |
|---|---|---|
| World/consumer price [belars per panel] | 400 | 400 |
| Production subsidy [belars per panel] | 0 | 100 |
| Price received by domestic producers [belars per panel] | 400 | 500 |
| Domestic production [panels per year] | 30 000 | 55 000 |
| Domestic consumption [panels per year] | 120 000 | 120 000 |
| Imports [panels per year] | 90 000 | 65 000 |
| Supply-curve assumption | Original domestic supply curve is linear from 30 000 to 55 000 panels | Original domestic supply curve is linear from 30 000 to 55 000 panels |
| Static welfare assumption | External benefits and external costs excluded | External benefits and external costs excluded |
For parts (iv) and (v), assume that the original domestic supply curve is linear over the range from 30 000 to 55 000 panels and that the static welfare calculation excludes external benefits and external costs. In part (b), evaluate any wider benefits separately.
Domestic firms argue that the subsidy will increase output without raising the price paid by households. The finance ministry is concerned about the fiscal cost and the opportunity cost of using government funds. Foreign producers are concerned about losing sales in Belesia.
Define the term subsidy.
Using Table 1, calculate the change in annual imports of solar panels.
Calculate the annual government expenditure on the production subsidy.
Calculate the gain in producer surplus resulting from the subsidy.
Calculate the welfare loss resulting from the production subsidy.
Draw a fully labelled international trade diagram showing the effect of the production subsidy on the Belesian solar-panel market.
Using the data, explain the effects of the subsidy on consumers and foreign solar-panel producers.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend whether the government of Belesia should introduce the production subsidy for domestic solar-panel firms.
Using a diagram, explain how an import quota affects domestic price, production, consumption and imports.
Using real-world examples, discuss how the allocation of import licences affects the consequences of an import quota.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Assuming a small open economy, a constant per-unit production subsidy and that imports continue after the subsidy, use a diagram to explain the effects of the subsidy granted to domestic firms that compete with imports.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the use of production subsidies as a form of trade protection.
Using a diagram, explain how an export subsidy affects an exporting country's domestic market.
Using real-world examples, discuss the view that export subsidies benefit domestic producers at the expense of other stakeholders.
Using a diagram, explain how product standards and regulations may act as administrative barriers to trade.
Using real-world examples, evaluate whether standards and regulations should be regarded as trade protection rather than legitimate public policy.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Faronia imposed a 20% tariff on imported footwear. Retail prices increased and imports fell, while domestic firms expanded production. Some firms import leather and machinery, so they receive little benefit from the policy when imported inputs become more expensive.
The government collects tariff revenue, but consumer groups argue that the policy reduces consumer surplus and creates two efficiency losses.
Domestic producers have proposed replacing the tariff with an import quota. They expect a quota to provide more certainty about the maximum quantity imported. The government has not decided whether licences would be auctioned or allocated free to importers.
Economists warn that a quota may be less transparent and encourage firms to spend resources lobbying for licences. A production subsidy would not increase the footwear price but would require government expenditure.
Annual footwear imports and domestic consumption in Faronia.
| Period | Footwear imports / million pairs | Domestic consumption / million pairs |
|---|---|---|
| Before tariff | 10 | 20 |
| After tariff | 7.5 | 18 |
Retail footwear price index before and after the tariff.
| Period | Retail footwear price index |
|---|---|
| Before tariff | 100 |
| After tariff | 112 |
Define the term tariff indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term import quota indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in footwear imports following the tariff.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage increase in the retail footwear price index.
Using an international trade tariff diagram, explain the tariff’s effect on footwear consumers and producers (Text A).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how higher prices for imported inputs could affect domestic footwear production (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using an international trade quota diagram, explain how a binding quota would affect footwear imports (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using an international trade production-subsidy diagram, explain why a production subsidy would affect consumers differently from the tariff (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate whether Faronia should use a tariff, an import quota or a production subsidy to protect its footwear industry.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Galena imposed a specific tariff on imported fertilizer to support a small domestic fertilizer industry. Domestic fertilizer producers expanded output, but farmers now pay a higher price and use less fertilizer.
Lower fertilizer use has reduced crop yields. Food processors also report higher prices for agricultural inputs, while the government receives tariff revenue from remaining imports.
Agricultural associations propose replacing the tariff with a domestic production subsidy. Consumers would then continue paying the world price while domestic fertilizer output increased.
Economists emphasize that producer surplus gained by fertilizer firms should be compared with consumer losses, fiscal effects and the inefficient use of resources. The government is also considering technical standards for fertilizer purity.
Fertilizer imports and use in Galena before and after the tariff.
| Period | Fertilizer imports / tonnes | Total fertilizer use / tonnes |
|---|---|---|
| Before tariff | 240 000 | — |
| After tariff | 168 000 | 300 000 |
Galena’s crop-yield index before and after the fertilizer tariff.
| Period | Crop-yield index |
|---|---|
| Before tariff | 125 |
| After tariff | 115 |
Define the term tariff indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term producer surplus indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in fertilizer imports following the tariff.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage decrease in Galena’s crop-yield index.
Using an international trade tariff diagram, explain the effect of the tariff on Galena’s fertilizer market (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how the fertilizer tariff may affect Galena’s agricultural output (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how the tariff may affect Galena’s general price level (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using an international trade production-subsidy diagram, explain the proposed alternative to the fertilizer tariff (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether Galena should replace its fertilizer tariff with a production subsidy.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Hesperia limits annual imports of electric vehicles using a binding quota. The domestic price has risen above the world price, domestic vehicle production has increased and consumers purchase fewer electric vehicles.
Import licences are given to foreign manufacturers. These firms receive the difference between the higher Hesperian price and the world price as quota rent, so part of the income generated by the restriction leaves Hesperia.
Environmental groups argue that slower adoption of electric vehicles increases demand for petrol vehicles and urban air pollution. Domestic manufacturers state that the quota gives them predictable market access.
The government is considering auctioning licences or replacing the quota with a tariff. Either policy could provide government revenue, although consumers would continue to face a higher price if protection remained equivalent.
Table 1: Electric-vehicle imports and domestic production
| Measure | Number of vehicles / year |
|---|---|
| Electric-vehicle imports before quota | 90 000 |
| Binding quota: permitted imports | 54 000 |
| Domestic EV production after quota | 36 000 |
Annual electric-vehicle registrations in Hesperia before and after the import quota.
| Period | Number of registrations / year |
|---|---|
| Before quota | 120 000 |
| After quota | 90 000 |
Define the term quota indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term quota rent indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in electric-vehicle imports caused by the quota.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage decrease in annual electric-vehicle registrations.
Using an international trade quota diagram, explain the effect of the quota on Hesperia’s electric-vehicle market (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using a negative consumption externality diagram for petrol vehicles, explain an indirect environmental effect of the electric-vehicle quota (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using an international trade quota diagram, explain how allocating licences to foreign manufacturers affects Hesperia’s national welfare (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using an international trade tariff diagram, explain how replacing the quota with an equivalent tariff could affect government revenue (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate whether Hesperia should retain the quota, auction the licences or replace the quota with a tariff.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Ilyria provides a payment for every metre of fabric produced by domestic textile firms. This production subsidy shifts domestic supply downwards and allows firms to compete with imports while consumers continue paying the world price.
Domestic production and employment have increased, while imports have fallen. The government’s expenditure applies to all subsidized domestic output, not only the additional output.
The subsidy increases producer surplus, but government expenditure is larger than the producer gain. The difference represents a production welfare loss as resources move into relatively high-cost domestic production.
Some subsidized factories use old machinery and cause water pollution. The government is considering making subsidy eligibility conditional on compliance with an environmental standard.
Annual domestic textile output and consumption in Ilyria
| Measure | Before subsidy | After subsidy |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic textile output / million metres | 400 | 520 |
| Domestic textile consumption / million metres | 900 | 900 |
Textile employment before and after the production subsidy.
| Period | Textile employment / workers |
|---|---|
| Before subsidy | 48 000 |
| After subsidy | 60 000 |
Define the term production subsidy indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term producer surplus indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in domestic textile output following the subsidy.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage increase in textile employment.
Using an international trade production-subsidy diagram, explain the subsidy’s effect on output, consumption and imports (Text A).
Using a labour-market diagram, explain the increase in textile employment (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using an international trade production-subsidy diagram, explain why the subsidy creates a welfare loss (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a negative production externality diagram, explain the potential effect of pollution from subsidized textile factories (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether Ilyria should continue its textile production subsidy.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Jorvik pays farmers for each tonne of wheat exported. The export subsidy raises the price received from export sales above the world price. Domestic sellers therefore also charge the higher price within Jorvik.
Wheat production and exports have increased, while domestic wheat consumption has decreased. Bread producers face higher input costs and the government’s subsidy expenditure has grown.
Farm owners gain producer surplus, but consumers lose consumer surplus. The subsidy also creates production and consumption distortions and may reduce foreign farmers’ revenue.
Two trading partners have threatened to impose tariffs on Jorvik’s wheat. The government is considering replacing export payments with a subsidy for investment in more efficient farm machinery.
Annual wheat exports and production in Jorvik
| Period | Wheat exports / million tonnes | Wheat production / million tonnes |
|---|---|---|
| Before export subsidy | 2.4 | — |
| After export subsidy | 3.3 | 5.1 |
Annual domestic wheat consumption in Jorvik before and after the export subsidy.
| Period | Domestic wheat consumption / million tonnes |
|---|---|
| Before export subsidy | 2.2 |
| After export subsidy | 1.8 |
Define the term export subsidy indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term consumer surplus indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in annual wheat exports.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage decrease in domestic wheat consumption.
Using an international trade export-subsidy diagram, explain the effects on Jorvik’s wheat market (Text A).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how the export subsidy may affect Jorvik’s bread market (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using the export-subsidy diagram, explain why the policy reduces Jorvik’s national economic welfare (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using an international trade tariff diagram, explain how retaliation could affect Jorvik’s wheat exporters (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate Jorvik’s export subsidy for wheat.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Kambara requires imported medicines to repeat clinical testing already completed in their country of origin. It also requires packages to use a unique size and label. These legally enforceable regulations have increased compliance costs and delayed market entry.
Domestic pharmaceutical firms do not face repeat testing. Foreign suppliers therefore describe the measures as an administrative barrier rather than a proportionate health policy.
The government argues that strict approval procedures prevent unsafe or ineffective medicines from being sold. However, hospitals report higher medicine prices and fewer available treatments. Small foreign producers are particularly affected by fixed testing costs.
Kambara is considering accepting certificates from foreign regulators that meet equivalent scientific standards. Domestic firms warn that increased competition would reduce their market share.
Average approval times for medicines in Kambara.
| Medicine category | Average approval time / months |
|---|---|
| Imported, before repeat-testing regulation | 8 |
| Imported, after repeat-testing regulation | 14 |
| Domestic medicines | 7 |
Imported medicine varieties before and after the regulation.
| Period | Imported medicine varieties |
|---|---|
| Before regulation | 640 |
| After regulation | 480 |
Define the term regulation indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term administrative barrier indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in average approval time for imported medicines.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage decrease in imported medicine varieties.
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how repeat testing may affect imported medicine prices (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how the regulations may affect domestic pharmaceutical firms (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using a market-failure diagram, explain how proportionate medicine regulation may improve welfare (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how accepting equivalent foreign certificates could affect the medicine market (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether Kambara’s pharmaceutical regulations are economically justified.
Argentina imports bicycles and is assumed to be a small open economy in this market. To support domestic bicycle manufacturers, the government introduced a tariff of 50 pesos per imported bicycle. Table 1 shows market information before and after the tariff.
Argentine bicycle market before and after a tariff.
| Market information | Before tariff | After tariff |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic price / pesos per bicycle | 200 | 250 |
| Tariff / pesos per imported bicycle | 0 | 50 |
| Domestic production / bicycles per year | 20 000 | 35 000 |
| Domestic consumption / bicycles per year | 100 000 | 80 000 |
| Imports / bicycles per year | 80 000 | 45 000 |
| World price / pesos per bicycle | 200 | 200 |
| Demand and supply assumption for (v) and (vi) | Linear between outcomes | Linear between outcomes |
For parts (v) and (vi), assume that domestic demand and supply curves are linear between the before- and after-tariff outcomes.
Domestic bicycle producers claim that the tariff will protect employment and allow investment in more efficient production. However, retailers argue that higher bicycle prices will reduce sales and discourage cycling. Foreign bicycle manufacturers have warned that they may reduce investment in distribution facilities in Argentina.
Define the term tariff.
Using Table 1, calculate the change in the number of bicycles imported following the tariff.
Calculate the annual tariff revenue received by the government of Argentina.
Calculate the change in annual expenditure by Argentine consumers on imported bicycles, measured at the prices paid by consumers.
Calculate the welfare loss caused by the tariff.
Draw a fully labelled international trade diagram showing the effects of the tariff on the Argentine bicycle market, including government revenue and welfare loss.
Using the data, explain how the tariff affects foreign bicycle producers.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend whether the government of Argentina should retain the tariff on imported bicycles.
Norland imports rice at a world price of 300 noras per tonne. The government is considering an annual import quota of 50 000 tonnes to increase domestic food production. Table 1 shows domestic supply and demand at different prices.
Table 1. Domestic rice supply and demand in Norland.
| Price / noras per tonne | Domestic supply / tonnes | Domestic demand / tonnes |
|---|---|---|
| 300 | 40 000 | 140 000 |
| 360 | 52 500 | 127 500 |
| 420 | 65 000 | 115 000 |
Assume that domestic supply and demand are linear between the prices shown in Table 1.
The government could auction the import licences or allocate them free of charge to foreign rice exporters. Low-income households spend a large proportion of their income on rice, while domestic farmers argue that protection is necessary to maintain rural employment.
Define the term import quota.
Using Table 1, determine the domestic price of rice if the quota is introduced.
Calculate the total quota rent created by the import quota.
Calculate the loss of consumer surplus resulting from the quota.
Calculate the gain in producer surplus received by domestic rice farmers.
Calculate the national welfare loss if the government auctions the import licences for their full value.
Calculate the national welfare loss if the import licences are allocated free of charge to foreign exporters.
Explain one administrative disadvantage of allocating import licences free of charge.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend how the government of Norland should manage the proposed restriction on rice imports.
Costavia exports coffee at a world price of 2.00 cocos per kg. The government is considering an export subsidy of 0.40 cocos for each kg exported. Table 1 shows the expected effects on the domestic coffee market.
Costavian coffee market before and after an export subsidy
| Market outcome | Before subsidy | After subsidy |
|---|---|---|
| World price / cocos per kg | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Export subsidy / cocos per kg | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| Domestic price / cocos per kg | 2.00 | 2.40 |
| Domestic production / million kg per year | 120 | 150 |
| Domestic consumption / million kg per year | 50 | 35 |
| Coffee exports / million kg per year | 70 | 115 |
| Demand and supply curves over relevant ranges | Linear | Linear |
| Economy and world price assumption | Small, price-taking economy; world price constant | Small, price-taking economy; world price constant |
| Foreign retaliation in numerical calculations | Ignored | Ignored |
Coffee producers argue that the subsidy would increase farm incomes and export market share. Consumer organizations are concerned about domestic food prices, while the finance ministry expects significant expenditure. Competing coffee exporters have suggested that they may introduce trade restrictions against Costavian coffee.
For parts (a)(iv) to (a)(vii), assume that Costavia is a small price-taking economy, the world price remains constant at 2.00 cocos per kg, and domestic demand and supply curves are linear over the relevant ranges. Ignore the effects of foreign retaliation in the numerical calculations; discuss its possible effects in part (b).
Define the term export subsidy.
Calculate the change in Costavia's coffee exports resulting from the subsidy.
Calculate the annual government expenditure on the export subsidy.
Calculate the loss of consumer surplus resulting from the export subsidy.
Calculate the gain in producer surplus resulting from the export subsidy.
Calculate the national welfare loss resulting from the export subsidy.
Draw a fully labelled international trade diagram showing the effects of the export subsidy on Costavia's coffee market.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend whether the government of Costavia should introduce the export subsidy for coffee.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Estara introduced a safety standard requiring electronic devices to undergo additional testing, certification and customs inspection. The standard applies to imported and domestic products, but foreign suppliers must complete testing in Estara even if equivalent tests have been completed abroad.
Table 1 shows market outcomes before and after the standard.
Estaran electronic-device market before and after the safety standard.
| Market outcome | Before standard | After standard |
|---|---|---|
| Average price / estars per device | 600 | 660 |
| Domestic production / devices per year | 20 000 | 28 000 |
| Domestic consumption / devices per year | 100 000 | 88 000 |
| Imports / devices per year | 80 000 | 60 000 |
Table 2 shows the compliance costs faced collectively by foreign suppliers after the standard.
Foreign-supplier compliance costs after the safety standard
| Cost item | Value |
|---|---|
| Fixed certification cost (collective) | 4.8 million estars |
| Testing cost | 25 estars per device |
| Customs-delay and inventory cost | 15 estars per device |
| Annual imports after standard | 60 000 devices |
The government argues that the standard reduces the risk of electrical fires and corrects information failure. Consumer groups accept the need for safety testing but question why equivalent foreign certificates are not recognized. Small foreign firms report that the fixed certification cost may force them to leave the Estaran market.
Define the term administrative barrier.
Using Table 1, calculate the change in annual imports of electronic devices following the introduction of the standard.
Using Table 2, calculate the average compliance cost per imported device after the standard.
Calculate the change in annual consumer expenditure on electronic devices.
Calculate the price elasticity of demand for electronic devices following the increase in average price, using the initial-value method.
Draw a demand and supply diagram showing how the administrative barrier may affect the market for imported electronic devices.
Explain why the safety standard may both improve market outcomes and act as trade protection.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend whether the government of Estara should retain, modify or remove the safety standard for electronic devices.
Using diagrams, explain how a tariff and an import quota may produce the same domestic price and quantity of imports.
Using real-world examples, evaluate whether governments should prefer tariffs to import quotas as a means of restricting imports.
Using a tariff diagram, explain how the changes in consumer surplus, producer surplus, government revenue and national welfare resulting from a tariff may be determined.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that the welfare loss caused by a tariff is always more significant than its benefits to domestic stakeholders.
Using a diagram, explain how the ownership of quota rents affects the importing country's national welfare.
Using real-world examples, discuss the view that import quotas cause greater economic harm than equivalent tariffs.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Using a diagram, explain how the effects of a production subsidy to an import-competing industry on government expenditure, producer surplus and national welfare may be determined.
Using real-world examples, evaluate whether a production subsidy is preferable to a tariff for protecting an import-competing industry.
Using a diagram, explain how an administrative barrier may affect foreign producers, domestic producers and consumers.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the effectiveness of administrative barriers compared with tariffs, quotas or subsidies in restricting imports.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Lydora imposes a tariff on imported canned fish. The policy has raised domestic prices, increased local production and reduced consumption and imports. Canning firms benefit, but retailers and households face higher prices.
The government also provides a production subsidy to fishing fleets. Because consumers can still purchase imported fresh fish at the world price, the subsidy increases domestic production without directly raising the fresh-fish price.
Marine scientists warn that larger catches are reducing fish stocks. Expanded domestic production may therefore create a welfare loss beyond the standard production distortion.
The government is considering replacing financial protection with a standard requiring all domestic and imported fish to be certified as sustainably caught. Foreign suppliers support equal treatment but are concerned about expensive documentation.
Table 1: Annual canned-fish imports and domestic consumption in Lydora.
| Period | Canned-fish imports / tonnes | Domestic consumption / tonnes |
|---|---|---|
| Before tariff | 160 000 | — |
| After tariff | 104 000 | 250 000 |
Lydora’s domestic fish-stock index before and after expanded support.
| Period | Fish-stock index |
|---|---|
| Before expanded support | 100 |
| After expanded support | 82 |
Define the term tariff indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term standard indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in canned-fish imports following the tariff.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage decrease in Lydora’s fish-stock index.
Using an international trade tariff diagram, explain the effect of the tariff on Lydora’s canned-fish market (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using an international trade production-subsidy diagram, explain the effect of the subsidy on Lydora’s fresh-fish market (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using a negative production externality diagram, explain how expanded fishing may reduce economic welfare (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how costly sustainability certification could affect imported fish (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate whether Lydora should replace its tariff and production subsidy with a sustainability standard applied equally to domestic and imported fish.
Darsenia is a small open economy that imports steel at a world price of 500 dinars per tonne. The government is considering either a tariff of 100 dinars per imported tonne or an import quota of 100 000 tonnes. The two policies would produce the same domestic price and market quantities.
Table 1: Darsenian steel market under free trade and alternative protection.
| Market measure | Free trade | Tariff | Import quota |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic price [dinars per tonne] | 500 | 600 | 600 |
| Domestic production [tonnes per year] | 100,000 | 140,000 | 140,000 |
| Domestic consumption [tonnes per year] | 300,000 | 240,000 | 240,000 |
| Tariff rate [dinars per tonne] | — | 100 | — |
| Import quota [tonnes per year] | — | — | 100,000 |
| Demand and supply curves | Straight lines | Straight lines | Straight lines |
For all calculations of consumer surplus, producer surplus and national welfare, assume that the domestic demand and supply curves are straight lines between the free-trade and protected outcomes.
If a quota is selected, the government may auction the import licences for their full value. Alternatively, it may allocate the licences free of charge to foreign steel exporters. Domestic steel firms support protection, but appliance and construction firms report that steel accounts for a substantial share of their production costs.
Define the term quota rent.
Using Table 1, calculate the change in steel imports resulting from either form of protection.
Calculate the government revenue generated by the tariff.
Calculate the total quota rent created by the import quota.
Calculate the loss of consumer surplus under either form of protection.
Calculate the national welfare loss under the tariff or under a quota whose licences are auctioned for their full value.
Calculate the national welfare loss if quota licences are allocated free of charge to foreign steel exporters.
Draw a fully labelled international trade diagram showing the effects of either the tariff or the equivalent import quota on Darsenia's steel market.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend whether Darsenia should use a tariff, an import quota or neither policy to protect its domestic steel industry.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Using an export-subsidy diagram, explain how the changes in consumer surplus, producer surplus, government expenditure and national welfare may be determined.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the economic consequences of export subsidies for both the subsidizing country and its trading partners.
Using diagrams, explain why an equivalent tariff, import quota and production subsidy may have different effects on national welfare.
Using real-world examples, discuss the view that all forms of trade protection inevitably reduce economic welfare.