Using a diagram, explain how a negative externality of production results in market failure.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the effectiveness of indirect taxes in correcting negative externalities of production.
Using a diagram, explain why a merit good may be underconsumed in a free market.
Using real-world examples, discuss whether subsidies are the most effective policy for increasing the consumption of merit goods.
Using a diagram, explain how consumption of a demerit good may cause allocative inefficiency.
Using real-world examples, discuss whether education and awareness creation are more effective than indirect taxation in reducing consumption that creates negative externalities.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Car use in Lydora has increased rapidly. Drivers receive the private benefits of convenient travel, but exhaust emissions and congestion impose costs on residents who are not involved in the journeys. This is a negative externality of consumption.
The city introduced a charge on vehicles entering the centre. Revenue is used to improve electric buses and protected cycle lanes. Some businesses argue that the charge reduces customer access and is unfair to low-income drivers.
Weekday car journeys into central Lydora before and after the road charge.
| Period | Car journeys (millions per weekday) |
|---|---|
| Before road charge | 2.40 |
| After road charge | 1.80 |
Lydora also funds an information campaign explaining the health and environmental benefits of cycling. Cycling can reduce pollution and improve public health, creating benefits for people other than the cyclist.
The government is considering a larger Pigouvian tax on high-emission vehicles, subsidies for electric buses and stricter vehicle-emission standards.
Daily cycling journeys before and after the information campaign in Lydora.
| Period | Daily cycling journeys / day |
|---|---|
| Before information campaign | 32 000 |
| After information campaign | 44 800 |
Define the term negative externality of consumption indicated in bold in Text A, paragraph 1.
Define the term Pigouvian tax indicated in bold in Text B, paragraph 2.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in weekday car journeys following the road charge.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage increase in daily cycling journeys following the information campaign.
Using a negative consumption externality diagram, explain why car journeys in Lydora may be overconsumed (Text A).
Using a Pigouvian-tax diagram, explain how the road charge could reduce the market failure (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using a positive consumption externality diagram, explain why cycling may be underconsumed in Lydora (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how the information campaign could increase cycling journeys (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the policies available to Lydora for reducing the external costs of urban road transport.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Takeaway-food businesses in Estara use large quantities of disposable packaging. Litter damages public spaces and marine habitats, while local taxpayers finance waste collection. Producers and consumers do not bear all these costs, resulting in market failure.
The government introduced a per-container indirect tax levied on suppliers of disposable containers and is considering mandatory reusable-packaging standards.
Disposable containers supplied each month in Estara before and after the government charge.
| Period | Containers supplied / million per month |
|---|---|
| Before charge | 8.0 |
| After charge | 6.2 |
Estara subsidizes refill-station services and provides information about reusable alternatives. Environmental groups argue that recycling alone does not prevent litter or excessive resource use.
A carbon tax on packaging production has also been proposed because manufacturing and transporting packaging generates greenhouse-gas emissions.
Disposable containers supplied and collected for recycling each month after the charge.
| Measure | Quantity / million containers per month |
|---|---|
| Disposable containers supplied after charge | 6.2 |
| Containers collected for recycling | 2.79 |
Define the term market failure indicated in bold in Text A, paragraph 1.
Define the term carbon tax indicated in bold in Text B, paragraph 2.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in monthly disposable-container supply after the charge.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage of supplied containers collected for recycling.
Using a negative production externality diagram, explain why packaging production may exceed the socially optimum level (Texts A and B).
Using an indirect-tax diagram, explain how the disposable-container charge affects the packaging market (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using a subsidy diagram, explain how subsidies for refill stations may affect reusable packaging (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how information about reusable alternatives may affect demand for disposable packaging (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate Estara's use of market-based and regulatory policies to reduce packaging waste.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Engineering firms in Meridia train apprentices. Some trained workers later move to other employers, so the original firms cannot capture all the benefits. Training therefore creates an externality.
Because firms consider their own costs and benefits, the market provides fewer apprenticeship places than society would prefer.
Annual apprenticeship places before and after the subsidy.
| Period | Annual apprenticeship places / places per year |
|---|---|
| Before subsidy | 18 000 |
| After subsidy | 24 300 |
The government pays firms for each apprentice trained and also finances technical colleges. Business groups support the payment, but critics argue that some subsidized firms would have trained workers without assistance.
The government aims to reach the socially optimum quantity of training while controlling public expenditure.
Government subsidy expenditure on apprenticeship training
| Subsidy per place / merids per place | Subsidized places / places per year |
|---|---|
| 1 200 | 24 300 |
Define the term externality indicated in bold in Text A, paragraph 1.
Define the term socially optimum quantity indicated in bold in Text B, paragraph 2.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in annual apprenticeship places following the subsidy.
Using Table 2, calculate total annual government expenditure on the subsidy.
Using a positive production externality diagram, explain why apprenticeship training is underprovided (Text A).
Using a subsidy diagram, explain how the payment to firms may increase apprenticeship training (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a positive consumption externality diagram, explain how publicly financed technical-college education may correct underconsumption (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a PPC diagram, explain how increased training may affect Meridia's productive capacity (Texts A and B).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate government subsidies and direct provision as responses to the underprovision of training in Meridia.
Explain how the characteristics of common pool resources can lead to the tragedy of the commons.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that government regulation is the most effective way to manage common pool resources sustainably.
Using a diagram, explain how a positive externality of production leads to underproduction in a free market.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the use of subsidies to correct positive externalities of production.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Using a diagram, explain how welfare loss arising from a negative externality of production can be calculated.
Using real-world examples, evaluate whether a carbon tax can eliminate the welfare loss caused by emissions from a polluting industry. For the standard output diagram, assume that emissions per unit of output are constant; distinguish output from emissions if this assumption does not hold.
Using a diagram, explain how the welfare loss associated with a positive externality of consumption is determined.
Using real-world examples, discuss the view that a combination of government provision and subsidies is the best way to reduce the welfare loss associated with merit goods.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Lake Norvale is open to fishing by households from several villages. Fish are rivalrous because a fish caught by one person cannot be caught by another, while excluding additional users is costly. The lake is therefore a common pool resource.
Fish catches have exceeded natural regeneration. Each fisher receives the private benefit from an additional catch but shares the depletion cost with all users, contributing to the tragedy of the commons.
Estimated adult fish stock in Lake Norvale.
| Time | Estimated adult fish stock / fish |
|---|---|
| Start of year 1 | 120 000 |
| Start of year 2 | 90 000 |
The regional authority proposes a total catch limit supported by tradable catch permits. Village councils instead favour collective monitoring, seasonal closures and locally agreed penalties.
The objective is sustainability, although fishers fear that tighter limits will reduce employment and income in the short run.
Annual fish catch in Lake Norvale
| Measure | Annual fish catch / fish per year |
|---|---|
| Current annual catch | 36 000 |
| Proposed sustainable catch limit | 27 000 |
Define the term common pool resource indicated in bold in Text A, paragraph 1.
Define the term sustainability indicated in bold in Text B, paragraph 2.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in the estimated adult fish stock.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage reduction in catch required to reach the proposed limit.
Using a negative production externality diagram, explain how excessive fishing causes market failure (Text A).
Using a production quota diagram, explain how the proposed catch limit could reduce overfishing (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a market for tradable permits diagram, explain how tradable catch permits could allocate the catch limit (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a PPC diagram, explain how continued depletion could affect Norvale's future productive capacity (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether tradable permits are the best way to manage the Norvale fishery sustainably.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Mangrove forests protect Salina Bay from storms and provide breeding habitats for fish. Access to some areas is difficult to restrict, while timber and habitat services are depleted by harvesting. The mangroves have characteristics associated with the tragedy of the commons.
Commercial operators cut mangroves for fuel and clear land for tourist facilities. The resulting erosion and lower fish catches affect coastal households.
Mangrove forest area in Salina Bay.
| Time | Mangrove forest area / hectares |
|---|---|
| Five years ago | 15 000 |
| Current | 12 600 |
The government funds mangrove planting and is considering protected zones, harvesting licences and community management. Hotel operators would also pay a conservation levy.
Restored mangroves create a positive externality of production because planting by one organization benefits fishers, residents and other businesses.
Annual mangrove planting recorded before and after the restoration subsidy.
| Period | Mangrove planting / hectares per year |
|---|---|
| Before subsidy | 400 |
| After subsidy | 620 |
Define the term tragedy of the commons indicated in bold in Text A, paragraph 1.
Define the term positive externality of production indicated in bold in Text B, paragraph 2.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in Salina Bay's mangrove forest area.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage increase in annual planting after the restoration subsidy.
Using a negative production externality diagram, explain the market failure caused by commercial mangrove clearance (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using a positive production externality diagram, explain why mangrove restoration may be underprovided (Text B).
Using a subsidy diagram, explain how the restoration subsidy can increase mangrove planting (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a production quota diagram, explain how protected zones could reduce mangrove clearance (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss the most effective approach for managing Salina Bay's mangroves sustainably.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Farms in Bellara use chemical fertilizer to increase crop yields. Nutrients entering rivers cause algae growth, reduce fish populations and raise water-treatment costs. Fertilizer use therefore creates a negative externality of production.
The government introduced a fertilizer levy and minimum standards for nutrient-management equipment.
Annual fertilizer sales in Bellara before and after the fertilizer levy.
| Period | Annual fertilizer sales / tonnes |
|---|---|
| Before levy | 500 000 |
| After levy | 415 000 |
Bellara subsidizes soil testing and precision-application equipment. It also funds training that helps farmers reduce runoff without sharply lowering output.
Officials face difficulty measuring the marginal external cost because runoff varies with rainfall, soil type and farm location.
Farms adopting precision-application equipment before and after the subsidy.
| Period | Farms using precision equipment |
|---|---|
| Before subsidy | 1 600 |
| After subsidy | 2 240 |
Define the term negative externality of production indicated in bold in Text A, paragraph 1.
Define the term marginal external cost indicated in bold in Text B, paragraph 2.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in annual fertilizer sales following the levy.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage increase in farms using precision-application equipment.
Using a negative production externality diagram, explain why fertilizer use results in allocative inefficiency (Text A).
Using an indirect-tax diagram, and assuming the levy is a per-unit tax on fertilizer suppliers, explain how the fertilizer levy may reduce runoff (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using a producer-subsidy diagram, and assuming the equipment subsidy is a per-unit subsidy paid to suppliers of precision-application equipment, explain how the equipment subsidy may encourage cleaner farming (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a regulation diagram, assuming compliance with the mandatory nutrient-management standards raises farms’ marginal costs, explain how the standards may affect farm output (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate Bellara's use of taxes, subsidies and regulation to reduce agricultural runoff.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Beekeepers in Virelia produce honey, while their bees also pollinate nearby fruit farms. Beekeepers receive no payment for much of this additional benefit. Beekeeping therefore creates a positive externality of production.
Colony losses caused by disease and habitat decline have reduced the number of commercial hives.
Commercial beehives in Virelia before and after the subsidy.
| Period | Commercial beehives / number |
|---|---|
| Before subsidy | 80 000 |
| After subsidy | 94 400 |
The government offers payments for new hives and finances wildflower corridors. Critics argue that large honey producers receive most of the subsidy.
Officials seek allocative efficiency, but it is difficult to estimate the value of pollination across different crops and regions.
Annual fruit output in participating districts before and after the pollination programme.
| Period | Annual fruit output / tonnes |
|---|---|
| Before pollination programme | 250 000 |
| After pollination programme | 277 500 |
Define the term positive externality of production indicated in bold in Text A, paragraph 1.
Define the term allocative efficiency indicated in bold in Text B, paragraph 2.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in commercial beehives after the subsidy.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage increase in annual fruit output in participating districts.
Using a positive production externality diagram, explain why the free market may underproduce beekeeping services (Text A).
Using a subsidy diagram, explain how payments for new hives may correct the market failure (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a positive production externality diagram, explain how wildflower corridors could affect the social cost of beekeeping (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how improved pollination may affect the fruit market (Table 2).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the policies available to Virelia for increasing pollination services.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Regular dental checks benefit patients and can reduce infections, school absences and pressure on public hospitals. Preventive dental care is therefore treated as a merit good.
Low-income households often postpone treatment because of its price and incomplete information about long-term benefits.
Annual preventive dental visits in Caldris before and after the voucher programme.
| Period | Preventive dental visits / million |
|---|---|
| Before voucher programme | 1.50 |
| After voucher programme | 1.95 |
The government introduced vouchers for low-income households and free dental checks in schools. It also funds an oral-health information campaign.
These policies aim to reduce the welfare loss associated with underconsumption, but they require additional taxation.
School days lost to dental illness before and after the programme.
| Period | School days lost to dental illness / days |
|---|---|
| Before the programme | 200 000 |
| After the programme | 146 000 |
Define the term merit good indicated in bold in Text A, paragraph 1.
Define the term welfare loss indicated in bold in Text B, paragraph 2.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in annual preventive dental visits.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage decrease in school days lost to dental illness.
Using a positive consumption externality diagram, explain why preventive dental care may be underconsumed (Text A).
Using a subsidy diagram, explain how dental vouchers may affect preventive-care consumption (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a positive consumption externality diagram, explain how free school dental checks may reduce welfare loss (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a consumer subsidy diagram, explain how dental vouchers may affect preventive-care consumption (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate Caldris's use of vouchers, government provision and education to increase preventive dental care.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Late-night venues in Raventon attract customers and employment, but amplified music and crowds associated with consuming the entertainment disturb nearby residents. Customers and venues do not compensate residents for sleep loss and stress. For this question, treat this harm as a negative consumption externality and assume that venue production creates no separate externality.
Late-night entertainment is consequently regarded as a demerit good when consumed at excessive noise levels.
Weekly late-night venue visits before and after the night-time levy.
| Period | Venue visits / week |
|---|---|
| Before levy | 120 000 |
| After levy | 105 000 |
The city introduced a levy charged to venues for each late-night customer visit. It also introduced maximum noise levels and an awareness campaign. It uses levy revenue to finance soundproofing grants for homes and venues. Table 1 compares visits before and after the levy, while Table 2 compares complaints before and after the full policy package. Treat these as descriptive before-and-after comparisons; they do not by themselves identify the causal effect of any one policy.
Officials want to maximize social surplus without eliminating the economic and cultural benefits of the entertainment district.
Monthly verified noise complaints before and after the policy package.
| Period | Verified noise complaints / month |
|---|---|
| Before policy package | 800 |
| After policy package | 560 |
Define the term demerit good indicated in bold in Text A, paragraph 2.
Define the term social surplus indicated in bold in Text B, paragraph 2.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in weekly late-night venue visits after the levy.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage decrease in monthly verified noise complaints.
Using a negative consumption externality diagram, explain why late-night entertainment may be overconsumed (Text A).
Using an indirect-tax diagram, explain how the night-time levy may affect venue visits (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a regulation diagram, explain how maximum noise levels may affect the market for late-night entertainment (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a subsidy diagram, explain how soundproofing grants could reduce the external costs of entertainment venues (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether regulation is preferable to market-based policies for reducing night-time noise in Raventon.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Textile dyeing is an important source of employment and export revenue in Nembia. However, untreated wastewater from textile factories damages downstream fisheries and increases water-treatment costs. Factories do not compensate affected households.
Table 1 provides linear marginal benefit and cost equations for Nembia's textile market. Quantity is measured in millions of metres of fabric per year and price, benefit and cost are measured in dollars per metre.
Table 1: Linear marginal benefit and cost equations for Nembia’s textile market.
| Curve | Equation |
|---|---|
| Marginal private benefit (MPB) and marginal social benefit (MSB) | |
| Marginal private cost (MPC) | |
| Marginal social cost (MSC) | |
| Quantity, | Million metres per year |
| Benefit and cost values | USD per metre |
The government is considering a Pigouvian tax on textile production. It can monitor factory output, but estimates of ecological damage are uncertain and smaller firms may find pollution-control equipment difficult to finance.
Define the term negative externality of production.
Using Table 1, calculate the free-market equilibrium quantity and price.
Determine the socially optimum quantity and the Pigouvian tax per metre required to achieve it.
Calculate the annual welfare loss caused by the unregulated market outcome.
Calculate the annual tax revenue if the Pigouvian tax achieves the socially optimum quantity.
Draw a fully labelled diagram showing the negative production externality and the Pigouvian tax that moves textile output from the free-market equilibrium to the social optimum.
Explain how the Pigouvian tax could reduce the external cost created by textile production.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy or policy mix that the government of Nembia should use to reduce the negative externality from textile wastewater.
A contagious respiratory disease causes worker absences and places pressure on public hospitals in Calidora. Vaccinated adults receive private protection, while other people benefit from reduced transmission. Vaccinations are currently purchased from private clinics.
Table 1 provides marginal benefit and cost equations for annual vaccinations. Quantity is measured in thousands of vaccinations and monetary values are measured in dollars per vaccination.
Marginal benefit and cost equations for annual adult vaccinations in Calidora.
| Curve | Equation | Marginal value / USD per vaccination |
|---|---|---|
| USD per vaccination | ||
| USD per vaccination | ||
| USD per vaccination |
The government is considering a producer subsidy, public provision through community clinics, and an information campaign. Rural access is limited, and some unvaccinated adults report that they are concerned about vaccine safety.
Define the term merit good.
Using Table 1, calculate the free-market equilibrium quantity and price of vaccinations.
Determine the socially optimum quantity and the subsidy per vaccination required to achieve it.
Calculate the annual welfare loss at the free-market equilibrium.
Calculate the government's annual expenditure on the subsidy if the socially optimum quantity is achieved.
Draw a fully labelled diagram showing the positive consumption externality and a subsidy that increases consumption to the socially optimum quantity.
Explain how public provision and education could each increase vaccination consumption.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy or policy mix that the government of Calidora should use to increase adult vaccination towards the socially optimum level.
Farmers in San Aurelio extract water from a shared underground aquifer. Individual wells are located on private farms, but excluding farmers from the connected aquifer is costly. Excessive withdrawal lowers the water table, increases pumping costs for other farmers and reduces future water availability.
Table 1 provides marginal benefit and cost equations for groundwater extraction. Quantity is measured in millions of cubic metres per year and monetary values are measured in cents per cubic metre; for conversions, 100 cents equal 1 currency unit.
Groundwater-extraction marginal benefit and cost equations.
| Curve | Equation |
|---|---|
Hydrologists estimate that the aquifer naturally recharges by 30 million cubic metres per year. A local water-user association proposes metered extraction rights, joint monitoring and penalties for members who exceed agreed allocations.
Define the term sustainability.
Using Table 1, calculate the unregulated quantity of groundwater extracted and its market price.
Determine the socially optimum extraction quantity and state whether it is below the aquifer's annual recharge.
Calculate the annual welfare loss caused by unregulated groundwater extraction.
Calculate the extraction charge per cubic metre required to achieve the socially optimum quantity and the annual revenue it would raise.
Draw a fully labelled diagram showing the market failure caused by groundwater extraction and the effect of a corrective extraction charge.
Explain how collective self-governance could reduce over-extraction from the aquifer.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend an approach that San Aurelio should use to manage groundwater extraction sustainably.
High-noise recreational vehicles are used on roads near residential and wildlife areas in Belvar. Buyers value the vehicles' performance, but their use causes sleep disturbance, stress and habitat disruption for third parties. Production itself creates no externality.
Table 1 provides marginal benefit and cost equations for the annual market. Quantity is measured in thousands of vehicles and monetary values are measured in hundreds of dollars per vehicle.
Marginal benefit and cost equations for high-noise recreational vehicles.
| Measure | Equation | Quantity / thousand vehicles per year | Monetary value / hundreds of dollars per vehicle |
|---|---|---|---|
After a small pilot information campaign in one region, annual sales there fell from 30 000 to 26 000 vehicles.
Define the term demerit good.
Using Table 1, calculate the free-market equilibrium quantity and price.
Determine the socially optimum quantity and the corrective tax per vehicle required to achieve it.
Calculate the annual welfare loss at the free-market equilibrium.
Calculate the annual tax revenue if the corrective tax achieves the socially optimum quantity.
Draw a fully labelled diagram showing the negative consumption externality and the effect of the corrective tax.
Using the pilot-campaign information, calculate the percentage decrease in sales in the pilot region and explain how awareness creation may reduce the externality.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy or policy mix that the government of Belvar should use to reduce the negative externality from high-noise recreational vehicles.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Explain why national policies alone may fail to achieve a socially optimum use of common pool resources that cross national borders. In your answer, draw and label a relevant diagram showing the difference between unregulated use and the socially optimum use.
Using real-world examples, to what extent are international agreements effective in achieving sustainable management of common pool resources?
Explain how tradable extraction permits may reduce the overuse of a common pool resource.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the effectiveness of tradable permits compared with regulation in managing common pool resources.
Draw and use your own diagram to explain how unsustainable production involving a common pool resource creates a negative externality.
Using real-world examples, to what extent is collective self-governance more effective than government intervention in achieving sustainable use of common pool resources?
Using a diagram, explain how a Pigouvian tax may move a market with a negative consumption externality towards allocative efficiency.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the consequences for stakeholders of using Pigouvian taxes to reduce consumption that creates negative externalities.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Peatlands in Oranta are drained and burned to clear land for agriculture. Smoke causes illness domestically and in neighbouring countries, while greenhouse gases contribute to global climate change.
Producers do not bear all these costs. Burning therefore creates a negative externality of production, and national action alone may be insufficient.
Annual area of peatland burned in Oranta.
| Year | Area burned / hectares |
|---|---|
| Before agreement | 240 000 |
| Latest year | 156 000 |
Oranta joined an international agreement requiring fire monitoring, restoration and penalties for illegal burning. Wealthier members provide satellite technology and conservation finance.
Enforcement remains difficult because fires occur in remote areas and countries disagree about responsibility and costs.
Reported and independently verified peatland fire incidents in Oranta, latest year.
| Incident category | Number of incidents |
|---|---|
| Reported fire incidents | 1 250 |
| Independently verified incidents | 875 |
Define the term negative externality of production indicated in bold in Text A, paragraph 2.
Define the term international agreement indicated in bold in Text B, paragraph 1.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in the annual area of peatland burned.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage of reported fire incidents that were independently verified.
Using a negative production externality diagram, explain why peatland burning causes market failure (Text A).
Using a carbon-tax diagram, explain how a tax on emissions from peatland burning could affect agricultural land clearing (Text A).
Using a regulation diagram, explain how penalties for illegal burning may affect agricultural output (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a PPC diagram, explain how peatland restoration could affect Oranta's future productive capacity (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss the importance and limitations of international cooperation in reducing peatland fires in Oranta.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Pastoral households in Darsana graze livestock on shared grasslands. Grazing is rivalrous because forage eaten by one herd is unavailable to another, but excluding established users is difficult.
Herd expansion has caused soil erosion and reduced future forage. The grassland is a common access resource vulnerable to overuse.
Average grass cover of monitored land in Darsana.
| Time period | Average grass cover / % of monitored land |
|---|---|
| Five years ago | 72 |
| Currently | 54 |
Grazing associations have introduced rotational access, herd limits and member-funded monitoring. This form of collective self-governance relies on locally agreed rules and penalties.
The national government is considering individual grazing permits, but mobile herders fear exclusion from traditional routes.
Livestock using Darsana's shared grassland.
| Measure | Livestock / head |
|---|---|
| Current livestock using grassland | 48 000 |
| Sustainable herd limit | 39 600 |
Define the term common access resource indicated in bold in Text A, paragraph 2.
Define the term collective self-governance indicated in bold in Text B, paragraph 1.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in average grass cover.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage reduction in livestock required to reach the sustainable herd limit.
Using a negative production externality diagram, explain why unregulated grazing may exceed the socially optimum quantity (Text A).
Using a production quota diagram, explain how a herd limit could reduce grassland degradation (Texts A and B).
Using a tradable-permit market diagram, explain how individual grazing permits could allocate the herd limit (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using a PPC diagram, explain how successful grassland conservation may affect Darsana's future productive capacity (Text B).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate collective self-governance as a method of managing Darsana's shared grasslands.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Households in Terenza replace electronic devices frequently. Informal recyclers burn cables and use unsafe chemicals, creating toxic smoke and contaminated water. These costs affect workers and neighbouring communities.
Cheap disposal encourages excessive replacement and unsafe processing. In a pilot, a Pigouvian tax was charged to sellers of newly sold devices.
Annual sales of new electronic devices before and after an implemented pilot Pigouvian tax charged to sellers.
| Period | New devices sold / million |
|---|---|
| Before pilot Pigouvian tax | 5.0 |
| After pilot Pigouvian tax | 4.4 |
Some discarded devices are exported to countries with weaker environmental enforcement. Terenza is negotiating common standards, shipment tracking and producer-financed recycling with its trading partners.
Effective policy requires monitoring to verify waste shipments and treatment methods. Producers warn that strict rules could raise device prices and reduce employment.
Tracked electronic-waste shipments in the latest year
| Shipment measure | Electronic waste / tonnes |
|---|---|
| Total exported | 320 000 |
| Covered by verified tracking records | 240 000 |
Define the term Pigouvian tax indicated in bold in Text A, paragraph 2.
Define the term monitoring indicated in bold in Text B, paragraph 2.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in annual electronic-device sales following the pilot charge.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage of exported electronic waste covered by verified tracking records.
Using a negative production externality diagram, explain why informal electronic-waste recycling may be overprovided (Text A).
Using an indirect-tax diagram, explain how a tax on newly sold devices may affect replacement and disposal (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using a subsidy diagram, explain how producer-financed support for certified recycling could affect safe recycling (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a regulation diagram, explain how common treatment standards could affect electronic-device producers (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate national and international policies for reducing the external costs of electronic waste in Terenza.
The Pelagos coastal fishery is open to all licensed domestic vessels. Fish are rivalrous because a fish caught by one vessel is unavailable to another, but excluding additional vessels has historically been difficult. The fish stock is declining because annual catch exceeds regeneration.
Table 1 gives the marginal benefit and cost equations for the Pelagos coastal fishery.
| Function | Equation | Quantity / thousand tonnes per year | Marginal value / USD per kg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thousand tonnes per year | USD per kg | ||
| Thousand tonnes per year | USD per kg | ||
| Thousand tonnes per year | USD per kg |
The fisheries authority proposes a total annual catch cap of 24 000 tonnes and transferable catch permits. Under an initial allocation, Fleet A receives permits for 14 000 tonnes and Fleet B receives permits for 10 000 tonnes. Fleet A then sells permits for 3 000 tonnes to Fleet B at 8 dollars per kilogram of permitted catch.
Define the term common pool resource.
Using Table 1, calculate the unregulated market quantity of fish caught and the market price.
Determine the socially optimum annual catch and the marginal external cost at that quantity.
Calculate the annual welfare loss caused by the unregulated catch.
Calculate the payment Fleet B makes to Fleet A for the transferable permits and state each fleet's catch entitlement after the trade.
Draw a fully labelled diagram showing market failure from over-extraction of the fish stock and the welfare loss at the unregulated market quantity.
Explain why open access to the Pelagos fishery can result in the tragedy of the commons.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend an approach that the Pelagos fisheries authority should use to manage the coastal fishery sustainably.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Cement production in Arandia emits greenhouse gases that contribute to global climate change. Cement producers do not bear the full climate cost of their emissions. Each tonne of cement produced releases 0.8 tonnes of carbon dioxide.
Table 1 provides marginal benefit and cost equations for cement. Quantity is measured in millions of tonnes of cement per year and monetary values are measured in dollars per tonne of cement.
Table 1: Marginal benefit and cost equations for Arandia’s cement market.
| Curve | Equation / USD per tonne; in million tonnes per year |
|---|---|
Arandia is considering a carbon tax. Several neighbouring countries do not price carbon, and domestic producers argue that a unilateral tax could cause cement production to relocate. Arandia is also negotiating a regional emissions agreement that would require verified emissions reporting.
Define the term carbon tax.
Using Table 1, calculate the free-market quantity and price of cement.
Determine the socially optimum output of cement and the carbon tax per tonne of carbon dioxide required to achieve it.
Calculate the annual welfare loss associated with the free-market output.
Calculate the percentage decrease in annual carbon dioxide emissions if the carbon tax achieves the socially optimum cement output.
Draw a fully labelled diagram showing the effect of the carbon tax on the market for cement.
Explain why international cooperation may make carbon pricing more effective.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend how Arandia should reduce carbon emissions from its cement industry.
Explain why difficulties in measuring external costs may prevent a government from achieving the socially optimum level of output.
Using real-world examples, discuss the view that a policy mix is always more effective than a single policy in correcting environmental externalities.