Colonialism and the development of nationalism in South-East Asia (c1750–1914)

Babur, Humayun and the establishment of Mughal power

Policies for consolidating Mughal rule

Akbar, Shah Jahan I and Aurangzeb

Religious cooperation and conflict

Domestic opposition to Mughal rule

Social, cultural and economic achievements

Internal and external causes of decline

### Babur and the Mughal claim

**Babur** was a Timurid prince from Central Asia who also claimed descent from Chinggis Khan through his mother. After he lost his ancestral base at Samarkand, he established himself in Kabul and turned his attention to northern India. His ambitions had several sources: dynastic claims, the search for territory and resources, and an invitation from opponents of the Delhi sultan, Ibrahim Lodi, to intervene.

At the **first battle of Panipat on 21 April 1526**, Babur defeated and killed Ibrahim Lodi. Although his army was smaller, field fortifications, disciplined cavalry, and the coordinated use of matchlocks and artillery gave him an advantage. The victory brought Delhi and Agra under his control, but it did not secure the subcontinent on its own.

Babur then faced a Rajput confederacy led by Rana Sanga of Mewar. His victory at **Khanwa in 1527** removed the immediate threat to his control of the north Indian heartland. He captured Chanderi in 1528 and defeated eastern Afghan forces at **Ghaghra in 1529**. By the time Babur died in 1530, he had created a powerful conquest state. Its administration and loyalty networks, however, remained fragile.

### Humayun’s loss of the empire

**Humayun** inherited the throne in 1530. Rivalry among his brothers, especially Kamran, weakened his authority, while Afghan chiefs continued to hold considerable power. The division of Timurid territories among the princes made cooperation within the dynasty difficult and restricted Humayun’s ability to concentrate his resources.

The greatest challenge came from **Sher Khan**, later Sher Shah Suri. He built an Afghan power base in Bihar and Bengal, then defeated Humayun at **Chausa in 1539** and again at **Kannauj, or Bilgram, in 1540**. Humayun lost Delhi and began a long period of exile.

Humayun secured assistance from the Safavid ruler Shah Tahmasp I. He recovered Kandahar in 1545 and then Kabul, which gave him a base from which to rebuild his position. After Sher Shah’s death, the Sur regime fragmented, creating an opportunity for Humayun to return. Mughal forces won at **Sirhind in 1555**, enabling Humayun to recover Delhi and Agra.

Humayun died after an accident in January 1556, only months after his restoration. His reign therefore contributed less to stable administration than to preserving the dynasty through defeat and exile. His recovery ensured that his son Akbar inherited a viable claim and a foothold in northern India.

### Territorial and military consolidation

Akbar came to the throne in 1556, while he was still a minor. His regent, **Bairam Khan**, defeated Hemu at the **second battle of Panipat in November 1556**, stopping the immediate collapse of restored Mughal power. Akbar took personal control in 1560 and then expanded into Malwa, Gujarat, Bengal and much of Rajputana. Later rulers carried Mughal influence into the Deccan.

Mughal armies used cavalry, infantry, artillery, fortified positions and siege warfare. The emperors drew commanders from several ethnic and religious backgrounds rather than relying on one group. Central Asian, Iranian, Afghan, Rajput, Indian Muslim and other commanders all entered imperial service. This increased the empire’s military resources, but it also forced the emperor to manage rivalry between powerful factions.

### Central government and the provinces

The emperor directed the government from the centre. He appointed senior officials and distributed rank and revenue assignments. Key offices included the **diwan**, who handled finance, and the **mir bakhshi**, who oversaw military appointments and records.

The empire was divided into **subahs**. Appointed officials governed them, with their responsibilities deliberately kept separate. Provincial governors commanded forces and maintained order, while financial officials monitored revenue. Separating these duties made it harder for one provincial servant to establish a completely independent government.

The **mansabdari system** placed imperial servants within a graded hierarchy. A mansab showed an officer’s personal rank and the cavalry he was required to provide. In the mature system, **zat** represented personal status and salary, while **sawar** showed the cavalry obligation. Mansabdars usually received temporary **jagirs**—revenue assignments from specified lands—instead of owning those lands as private property.

### Revenue and economic policy

Land revenue supported the state financially. Under Akbar, Raja Todar Mal was linked to the development of the **zabt** system. It assessed cultivated land and used information about prices and production to set cash demands. The **dahsala** arrangement based assessments on averages from a ten-year period, making them more regular in the core provinces.

This approach gave the government a substantial and fairly predictable income. Its success, however, depended on local zamindars, record keepers and cultivators. Heavy assessments, poor harvests or corruption could turn an effective administrative system into a cause of peasant hardship and resistance.

### Religious, domestic and cultural policy

Akbar reinforced Mughal rule through alliances with Rajput houses. Rajput rulers who accepted Mughal supremacy could keep their local authority and receive high imperial rank. Marriage alliances strengthened some of these political partnerships, though Mewar remained a major centre of resistance.

Akbar’s principle of **sulh-i kul**, or universal peace, portrayed the emperor as an impartial ruler above sectarian divisions. He abolished the pilgrimage tax and the jizya, appointed Hindus to senior office and encouraged debate between different religious traditions. The policy was practical as well as ideological. Cooperation made it easier for a Muslim dynasty to govern a predominantly non-Muslim population.

Persian was the main language of administration and high culture. Court patronage supported chronicles, painting, architecture and the translation of Sanskrit works into Persian. Cultural policy helped project magnificence, record imperial authority and connect different elite traditions across the subcontinent.

### Akbar, 1556–1605

Akbar turned an insecure northern kingdom into a durable subcontinental empire. Military expansion brought Gujarat, Bengal, Kashmir, Sindh and much of Rajputana under Mughal authority. Early advances into the Deccan also pushed imperial ambitions southwards.

His greatest achievement was linking conquest with effective administration. The mansabdari system connected nobles to imperial service, while provincial government made further expansion easier to manage. Revenue reforms provided the court with the resources needed to reward officials and maintain armies. Rajput alliances widened the ruling class, and sulh-i kul supported the emperor’s claim to govern subjects of different faiths.

Akbar also developed the ideology of Mughal monarchy. Court histories, ceremonies and art portrayed him as a divinely favoured, just sovereign. Some interpretations stress his personal rule more than institutional government, although later emperors retained many of its central practices.

### Shah Jahan I, 1628–1658

**Shah Jahan I** ruled the empire during a period of exceptional wealth and courtly splendour. His reign is closely linked to monumental architecture, especially the Taj Mahal, the Red Fort at Delhi and the Jama Masjid. These projects displayed dynastic legitimacy and imperial order, while demonstrating the emperor’s command of resources and skilled labour.

Government became more formal, and court ceremony grew increasingly elaborate. Mughal authority remained strong, but campaigns placed greater pressure on the Deccan states. Shah Jahan’s attempts to recover Kandahar from the Safavids failed. His Central Asian ambitions also brought heavy expense without producing lasting territorial gains.

When Shah Jahan became ill in 1657, his sons fought for the succession. Aurangzeb defeated Dara Shukoh and the other contenders, deposed his father in 1658 and confined him at Agra. The conflict exposed the danger of having no fixed law of succession.

### Aurangzeb, 1658–1707

Aurangzeb expanded Mughal territory to its greatest geographical extent. He annexed **Bijapur in 1686** and **Golconda in 1687**, ending the independence of the two major Deccan sultanates. Conquest, however, did not guarantee secure control. During the final decades of his reign, the emperor remained in the Deccan, fighting a mobile and resilient Maratha resistance.

Aurangzeb presented himself as a more explicitly Islamic ruler than Akbar. He reimposed the jizya in 1679 and ordered some temples destroyed, particularly when they were associated with rebellion. Hindu officials still served in large numbers, and the state protected or supported some non-Muslim institutions. His policy was therefore neither complete religious separation nor a simple continuation of Akbar’s approach.

Historians disagree about his significance. Some argue that his religious measures weakened relations with some Rajputs, Marathas and Sikhs. Another interpretation emphasizes structural pressures, including the cost of continuous warfare, competition for jagirs and the difficulty of governing such a vast empire. Aurangzeb enlarged Mughal territory, but he left his successors with a state whose military and financial commitments had become difficult to sustain.

### Cooperation as a foundation of government

The Mughal state ruled a population containing many religious communities, while its governing elite included Sunni and Shia Muslims, Hindus and others. Cooperation was therefore essential to taxation, recruitment and local administration.

Akbar abolished the pilgrimage tax in 1563 and the jizya in 1564. He appointed Rajputs and other Hindus to high mansabs and formed political and marital alliances with Rajput ruling houses. These policies allowed local elites to enter imperial service without abandoning their social identities or regional influence.

Akbar established the **Ibadat Khana** at Fatehpur Sikri in 1575 as a setting for religious discussion. Debate initially involved Muslim scholars but later included representatives of other traditions. The 1579 **Mahzar** strengthened Akbar’s authority to decide among conflicting legal opinions. His later association with the **Din-i Ilahi** did not create a mass religion; it involved a very small group of courtiers and expressed personal loyalty and ethical discipline.

Religious cooperation had direct political effects. It widened the recruitment base of the empire, reduced the likelihood of a united Hindu opposition and supported an image of the emperor as guardian of all subjects. Persian translations of Sanskrit texts, including the Mahabharata, also encouraged cultural exchange at court.

### Sources of religious conflict

Cooperation varied between reigns and never removed political conflict. Jahangir ordered the execution of the Sikh Guru Arjan in 1606 after Prince Khusrau’s rebellion. This marked an important deterioration in relations between the Mughal state and the Sikh community, although political disobedience and religious identity were closely connected.

Under Aurangzeb, the reimposition of the jizya in 1679 symbolized a narrower conception of Islamic kingship and imposed a visible distinction on non-Muslim subjects. Orders against particular temples also caused resentment. Such destruction was often linked to centres of rebellion, but it carried a wider religious meaning and damaged the dynasty’s reputation among affected communities.

The execution of **Guru Tegh Bahadur in 1675** deepened Sikh hostility. Under Guru Gobind Singh, the creation of the **Khalsa in 1699** gave the Sikh community a more strongly militarized identity. Conflict with the state continued into the reign of Bahadur Shah I.

The Rathor succession crisis after the death of Jaswant Singh of Marwar in 1678 also combined political and religious tensions. Aurangzeb’s intervention provoked Rajput resistance and weakened a partnership that had supported the empire since Akbar’s reign.

### Overall impact

Religious policy mattered most when it affected alliances, taxation and access to office. Cooperation strengthened imperial legitimacy and gave the Mughals experienced local partners. Conflict encouraged some communities to identify opposition to imperial policy with defence of religious and regional autonomy.

Interpretations differ over how far religion caused Mughal weakness. Some accounts emphasize Aurangzeb’s departure from Akbar’s inclusiveness. Others argue that supposedly religious conflicts usually arose from disputes over sovereignty, succession, revenue and local power. The two explanations overlap: political actions could acquire religious significance and thereby mobilize broader resistance.

### Why opposition developed

Domestic opposition grew for several reasons. Mughal expansion threatened established rulers, while revenue demands placed pressure on local society. Nobles also competed for rank, jagirs and influence. Religious identity sometimes strengthened resistance, but most rebellions were also about authority, land or taxation.

The empire’s size brought its own problems. Provincial officers and zamindars had local knowledge and armed followers, while the court was far away. Whenever imperial power seemed weak—during minorities, succession disputes or long wars—local leaders could withhold revenue or claim greater autonomy.

### Noble and dynastic challenges

During the 1560s, Akbar faced rebellions from Uzbek nobles and from Timurid Mirzas with dynastic claims of their own. By suppressing these revolts, he reduced the independence of powerful military families and strengthened the practice of appointing officials through imperial favour.

Members of the ruling family also rebelled. Prince Salim, the future Jahangir, challenged Akbar before succeeding him in 1605. Jahangir’s son Khusrau rebelled in 1606. Shah Jahan rebelled against Jahangir during the 1620s. Then, in 1657, Shah Jahan’s illness triggered a destructive war among Dara Shukoh, Shah Shuja, Murad and Aurangzeb.

These conflicts consumed armies and money that could otherwise have supported government. They also gave nobles and regional rulers an opportunity to bargain for rewards by backing rival princes.

### Rajput, Maratha and popular resistance

Mewar resisted Mughal expansion under Rana Pratap, especially at the **battle of Haldighati in 1576**. Mughal forces won the field, but resistance did not end immediately. A settlement was finally reached under Jahangir in 1615.

Later in the 17th century, Mughal intervention in Marwar led to a prolonged Rathor rebellion. It also damaged relations with Mewar and weakened an important Rajput alliance.

The most sustained challenge came from the **Marathas**. Shivaji built his power in the western Deccan by using hill forts, rapid cavalry movement and raids. After visiting Aurangzeb’s court at Agra in 1666, he was briefly detained, but escaped and resumed his expansion. Shivaji died in 1680, and his son Sambhaji was executed in 1689. Resistance nevertheless continued, first under Rajaram and then under Tarabai. The Mughals could seize forts and territory, but they struggled to destroy the dispersed Maratha political and military network.

Other disturbances included the **Jat revolt** led by Gokula in 1669, the **Satnami rising of 1672**, and later Jat resistance under leaders such as Churaman. Sikh opposition also became more organised after the conflicts involving Guru Tegh Bahadur and Guru Gobind Singh.

### Effects on the empire

Domestic opposition forced the state to fund expensive campaigns across several regions. Constant warfare put greater pressure on the jagirdari system, disrupted cultivation in some areas and made revenue collection less reliable. Rebellions also showed that imperial authority depended on negotiation with local elites, rather than on direct control from the court alone.

The state defeated some opposition without suffering permanent damage. The greater problem was the accumulation of conflicts. By Aurangzeb’s final years, Rajput alienation, Maratha warfare, Sikh militarization and local agrarian resistance were taking place alongside competition among Mughal nobles. The empire remained formidable, but more and more of its resources were being used to preserve obedience.

### Social and political integration

Mughal rule drew regional elites into imperial service. Through the mansabdari system, Central Asian, Iranian, Afghan, Rajput, Indian Muslim and other groups entered a shared hierarchy centred on the emperor. Their differences remained, but the system created a mobile ruling class. Its members could build careers far beyond their home regions.

Royal women could also wield considerable influence. Nur Jahan issued orders and influenced appointments during Jahangir’s reign. Under Shah Jahan I, Jahanara Begum became an important patron of architecture, commerce and Sufi institutions. These examples show what was possible for royal women; they do not represent the position of women across Mughal society.

The empire encouraged cities such as Agra, Delhi, Lahore and the provincial capitals to grow. Court demand drew in administrators, soldiers, merchants and craftspeople. Social gains were not shared equally. Cultivators bore much of the revenue burden, while famine and warfare could cause severe suffering in particular areas.

### Architecture and urban culture

Mughal architecture brought together Persianate, Central Asian and Indian forms. Akbar’s buildings at Agra and Fatehpur Sikri featured monumental gateways, courtyards and carved stone.

During Shah Jahan I’s reign, architects placed more emphasis on symmetry, formal gardens, marble and refined decoration. The **Taj Mahal**, completed as a mausoleum for Mumtaz Mahal, showed the resources and technical expertise available to the court. The Red Fort and Jama Masjid helped establish Shahjahanabad—imperial Delhi—as a political and ceremonial capital.

Buildings served practical purposes as well as decorative ones. Forts protected strategic positions, while roads and caravanserais supported communication. Planned palace complexes arranged the relationship between the emperor, the court and the public audience.

### Literature, painting and learning

Persian became the language of administration, history and elite literature. Court chronicles such as the Akbarnama recorded events while offering an official view of kingship. Translation projects brought Sanskrit works to Persian-reading elites and encouraged intellectual exchange.

Mughal miniature painting combined Persian techniques with Indian subjects and increasingly close observation. Akbar supported illustrated manuscripts and large workshops. Jahangir favoured portraiture, studies of animals and plants, and carefully composed individual works. Imperial and noble patronage also supported music, calligraphy, textiles, jewellery and the decorative arts.

Cultural exchange helped produce mixed linguistic forms, including the growth of Urdu through interaction among Persian, Arabic and local north Indian languages. Regional traditions continued alongside court culture instead of merging into one Mughal identity.

### Economic strength

Agriculture supported the economy, while extensive craft production supplied domestic and overseas markets. Major products included cotton textiles, silk, indigo, sugar and other commercial crops. Bengal became especially important for textiles and silk. Gujarat’s ports linked inland production with Indian Ocean trade.

Merchants used credit networks, bills of exchange and commercial communities that connected cities and ports. Silver brought in through international trade supported monetization and helped the state collect revenue in cash. Portuguese, Dutch and English merchants took part in this economy, but for most of the period they worked within conditions set by Indian rulers and commercial groups.

Economic success depended on a productive agrarian population and highly skilled artisans, rather than on imperial direction alone. The revenue system financed court culture and military power, but it could also move wealth away from villages. Mughal prosperity was considerable, though unevenly distributed.

### What had declined by 1712?

The Mughal Empire did not suddenly disappear when Aurangzeb died in 1707. It still controlled major cities, possessed large armies and retained considerable prestige. By **1712**, when Bahadur Shah I died, what had weakened was central authority. Emperors struggled to control appointments, secure revenue and force regional powers to obey.

### Internal forces

The long Deccan wars placed the greatest immediate strain on the empire. Aurangzeb’s annexations of Bijapur and Golconda enlarged Mughal territory, but they also removed states that had acted as buffers against Maratha expansion. Mughal armies became tied down in sieges and garrison duty. They also had to pursue mobile opponents across difficult terrain.

This pressure contributed to a **jagirdari crisis**. The number of mansabdars and their expectations increased, while suitable revenue assignments became harder to provide. During temporary appointments, jagirdars tried to extract as much revenue as possible. This created conflict with zamindars and cultivators. Competition for office also deepened factional divisions at court.

The absence of a fixed rule of succession repeatedly led to civil war. After Aurangzeb’s death, his sons Muazzam, Azam and Kam Bakhsh fought for power. Muazzam became **Bahadur Shah I**, ruling from 1707 to 1712, but he depended on compromise with competing nobles and regional forces. His death began another succession struggle.

Domestic resistance further weakened central control. The Marathas survived Aurangzeb’s campaigns and became capable of sustained expansion. Rajput relations had not fully recovered from the Marwar conflict, while Sikh and Jat opposition continued. These movements were different from one another, yet they forced the court to divide its military attention and negotiate from a weaker position.

Religious policy remains debated. Some interpretations see Aurangzeb’s jizya and temple policies as decisive because they weakened loyalty among non-Muslim subjects. Others give greater weight to fiscal strain, warfare and elite competition. Religious tensions caused the most damage where they strengthened existing struggles over local authority.

### External forces

The Safavid Empire remained a serious rival on the north-western frontier. The Safavids captured **Kandahar in 1649**, and Shah Jahan I’s repeated attempts to recover it failed. Earlier Mughal campaigns in Balkh and Badakhshan in 1646–1647 had also proved expensive and temporary. These setbacks showed the limits of Mughal power beyond the subcontinent.

European trading companies became more active along the coast. During **Child’s War, 1686–1690**, the English East India Company fought Aurangzeb’s government, but the conflict ended in an English submission. This showed that Europeans could not yet overthrow Mughal authority. Their fortified ports, naval strength and growing role in Indian Ocean trade still represented an external force that the land-based empire did not fully control.

By 1712, external pressure was less immediately destructive than internal overextension. Safavid rivalry caused territorial and financial losses, while European companies were only beginning to gain greater leverage. The central problem was that costly frontier and Deccan commitments intensified weaknesses in revenue, military organization and political unity.

### Weighing the causes

One interpretation places the main blame on Aurangzeb’s prolonged Deccan warfare, expansion beyond manageable limits and policies that damaged established alliances. A structural interpretation instead stresses problems already built into the empire: its dependence on personal imperial leadership, competition for jagirs and recurring wars of succession.

The strongest explanation combines both views. Mughal institutions had managed earlier crises under forceful rulers, but Aurangzeb’s expansion created demands that those institutions could no longer reliably meet. After 1707, weak succession arrangements and regional resistance stopped Bahadur Shah I from restoring central control. By 1712 the empire remained intact, but power was shifting away from the emperor towards nobles, regional rulers and military communities.

Exploration, trade and interaction in East Asia and South-East Asia (1405–1700)

History

IB History develops students' understanding of significant historical events, themes, and interpretations across different periods and regions.Students learn to analyze historical sources critically, understand complex historical narratives, and develop sophisticated historical thinking skills.

HL3.4 The rise and fall of the Mughal Empire (1526–1712)

Question 1

[15]

Question 2

[15]

Question 3

[15]

Question 4

[15]