This content can't be printed from the browser. Use Export PDF with Pro for an offline copy.
Describe how outcomes are measured and recorded in an experiment.
Describe how a questionnaire can be used to collect and record standardized responses from participants.
A class practical investigated whether background conversation affected concentration during a task. Ten adult students who volunteered after a classroom announcement completed one letter-search sheet in silence and another while a recording of conversation played, with half completing the silent condition first. The researchers measured concentration by counting the target letters each participant failed to mark during a two-minute period.
Apply the concept of measurement to the way concentration was investigated in this practical.
A class practical used a questionnaire to investigate how supported students felt by their friends. Twenty adult students recruited from an available college class answered the question, “How often do your friends support you?”, choosing “rarely”, “sometimes” or “often”. The researchers assigned these answers scores of 1, 2 and 3 and treated the score as a measure of how supported each student felt.
Explain the concept of measurement in relation to this questionnaire.
Build a Practice Exam — Psychology HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Compare and contrast the research methodology of an experiment with that of a naturalistic observation, with reference to how behaviour is measured.
Compare and contrast a questionnaire and a semi-structured interview as methods for measuring participants’ experiences.
Researchers investigated whether introducing protected rest breaks reduced workplace stress among hospital reception staff. Two hospitals agreed to participate. Managers circulated an invitation, and 36 employees volunteered. One hospital introduced a daily protected twenty-minute break for six weeks; the other continued its usual arrangements. Employees were not assigned to hospitals by the researchers. Both hospitals experienced changes in patient numbers during the investigation.
Before and after the six weeks, each employee took part in an individual interview in a private room at work. Researchers asked the same six questions about experiences during the previous working week, including feeling overwhelmed, difficulty relaxing after work and concerns about making mistakes. Employees could elaborate on their answers. Interviews were recorded with permission. Participants were told that participation was voluntary and that managers would receive only a summary of the findings, not recordings or individual responses.
Two researchers independently read each transcript. They counted every sentence containing an expression of worry or tension and used the total as the employee’s stress score. A sentence could count only once, even if it contained several expressions. The researchers discussed disagreements and agreed on a final score. They knew which hospital each employee worked at. Interview length varied because some employees gave much longer answers than others.
At the hospital introducing breaks, the mean stress score fell from 12 to 7. At the other hospital, it fell from 11 to 10. Several employees described the breaks as helpful, although others said they still worried about unfinished work. The researchers concluded that protected breaks reduced stress and recommended extending the arrangement to other hospitals. They did not collect additional evidence about employees’ experiences outside work.
Discuss this study with reference to two or more of the following concepts: measurement, bias, causality and responsibility.
Researchers investigated whether feedback about improvement encouraged adults to continue learning a difficult skill. Sixty adults volunteered after seeing an advertisement at a public library. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups of thirty. Everyone completed a ten-minute introductory lesson on folding unfamiliar paper shapes, delivered through the same recorded instructions. They then attempted three practice shapes individually in separate workspaces.
One group received the message, “Your folds are becoming more accurate with practice.” The other received the message, “You have completed the practice stage.” These messages were delivered automatically and were not based on individual performance. Participants had consented to a study of learning activities but were not told beforehand that the researchers were comparing the messages.
Participants were then offered up to twenty minutes to attempt a more complicated shape. They were told that they could stop at any time without losing their payment and could use the remaining time to read magazines. Researchers measured willingness to continue learning as the number of minutes from the start of this optional stage until a participant chose to stop. Anyone still working after twenty minutes received a score of twenty. A researcher who did not know which message participants had received recorded the stopping times. Afterwards, participants rated how much they had wanted to improve, from one, “not at all”, to seven, “very much”.
The improvement-message group continued for a mean of sixteen minutes, compared with eleven minutes in the other group. Both groups gave a mean rating of five for wanting to improve. Some participants said they continued because folding was enjoyable; others said they wanted to avoid appearing unhelpful. During debriefing, researchers explained the purpose of the messages and offered participants the opportunity to withdraw their data. They concluded that feedback about improvement increased willingness to learn.
Discuss this study with reference to two or more of the following concepts: measurement, causality, bias and responsibility.
Build a Practice Exam — Psychology HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


A class practical investigated whether the time available to study a list affected how many words participants could remember. Ten adult volunteers recruited through a college noticeboard studied a list for 30 seconds and wrote down the words they remembered, then studied the same list for 60 seconds and repeated the recall task. The researchers counted correctly recalled words, but participants asked whether spelling mistakes and repeated words would be counted.
Design a revised experiment to investigate this aim using a clear and consistent measurement procedure.
A class practical investigated how friends maintain contact when they attend different colleges. Twelve adult volunteers recruited through a student association completed a questionnaire containing only the question, “Do you keep in touch with your friends?”, with “yes” and “no” as the response options. Participants completed it together during a club meeting, and the researchers recorded the selected answers.
Suggest a revised questionnaire procedure for investigating this aim, explaining how responses would be collected and recorded.
Discuss the role of measurement in understanding differences in the prevalence of health problems between populations in the context of health and well-being.
In the context of human development, evaluate the contribution of measurement to understanding cognitive development.
Build a Practice Exam — Psychology HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Examine the role of measurement in understanding the formation of relationships in the context of human relationships.
A research team investigated how cooperation develops during early childhood. Four community childcare centres invited families to participate, and the parents of 48 children agreed. Sixteen children were aged three, sixteen were aged four and sixteen were aged five. The researchers observed each child once during the same month. The centres differed in how often they organized activities requiring children to work together.
Children worked in groups of four with familiar classmates. Each group received wooden pieces and was asked to build a bridge together in fifteen minutes. An adult read identical instructions and remained nearby without offering construction advice. Parents gave permission for video recording, and children were told that they could stop or choose another activity. Recordings were stored using identification numbers rather than names.
The researchers defined a cooperative action as handing a piece to another child, accepting another child’s suggestion or helping another child attach pieces. Each action received one point. Two researchers scored the recordings separately and then discussed differences. Children’s ages were visible on the recording labels. Actions such as watching quietly, moving pieces out of another child’s way or suggesting that everyone build separate sections were not included unless they met one of the three rules.
The mean number of cooperative actions was 5 among three-year-olds, 8 among four-year-olds and 12 among five-year-olds. The researchers concluded that children become more cooperative as they grow older. Childcare staff welcomed the clear scoring system but noted that some children contributed through quiet planning rather than frequent exchanges. Others said that accepting a suggestion could reflect obedience rather than cooperation. The team nevertheless proposed using the task to identify children who might need additional support in working with others.
Discuss this study with reference to two or more of the following concepts: measurement, change, bias and perspective.
Researchers investigated whether romantic partners agreed about how they resolved everyday disagreements. Twenty-four couples responded to advertisements in community centres. All participants were adults who had lived with their partner for at least one year. Each partner consented separately, and the researchers explained that individual written responses would not be shared with the other partner. Participants could decline any question or stop without giving a reason.
For fourteen evenings, partners independently completed a short written record. They described any disagreement that day, what each person did and whether they considered the issue resolved. If there had been no disagreement, they recorded this instead. The instructions defined a disagreement as an occasion when partners wanted different outcomes, whether or not they argued aloud. Partners were asked not to compare records, although completion took place at home.
At the end of the fortnight, each couple attended a research room and discussed a minor unresolved issue of their choice for ten minutes. They could exclude any topic they considered too personal. The discussion was recorded with permission. Two researchers independently counted interruptions and statements explicitly acknowledging the other person’s viewpoint. A third researcher read the evening records and placed each account into one of three categories: resolved through discussion, resolved by dropping the issue, or unresolved. Accounts were categorized separately even when both partners described the same event.
Partners frequently disagreed about whether an issue had been resolved. Some described dropping a topic as a successful outcome, while their partners described feeling unheard. Couples whose recorded discussion contained more acknowledgments often described more issues as resolved through discussion. However, several couples wrote that the research-room conversation was calmer than their conversations at home. The researchers concluded that explicit acknowledgment was a useful indicator of successful conflict resolution and proposed including it in guidance for couples.
Discuss this study with reference to two or more of the following concepts: measurement, perspective, bias and responsibility.
With reference to learning and cognition, to what extent does measurement limit our understanding of cognitive processes?
Build a Practice Exam — Psychology HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.

