Clastify logo
Clastify logo
Subjects
Features
Review
HOT
Tutoring

1.2 How do economists approach the world?

Practice exam-style IB Economics questions for How do economists approach the world?, aligned with the syllabus and grouped by topic.

Verified by Rishabh
Verified by Rishabh
Paper
Difficulty
Status
Level
Question 1
SL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator
SL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator

A

Explain how economists use hypotheses, models and empirical evidence to develop economic theories.

[10]
B

Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that improved empirical evidence will enable economists to make accurate predictions.

[15]
Question 2
SL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator
SL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator

A

Explain the role of the ceteris paribus assumption in an economic model of demand.

[10]
B

Using real-world examples, discuss whether simplifying assumptions make economic models less useful for policy making.

[15]
Question 3
SL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator
SL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator

A

Explain the distinction between positive and normative economics in the analysis of a government subsidy.

[10]
B

Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that economic evidence should determine whether a government introduces a subsidy.

[15]
Question 4
SL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator
SL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator

A

Explain why greater equality of income does not necessarily result in greater equity.

[10]
B

Using real-world examples, discuss whether progressive taxation is an equitable way to redistribute income.

[15]

Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL

Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.

Practice exam question preview
Practice exams dashboard preview
Question 5
SL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator
SL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator

A

Explain how self-interest and competition may coordinate economic activity according to Adam Smith's idea of the invisible hand.

[10]
B

Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that laissez-faire markets provide the most effective way to coordinate economic activity.

[15]
Question 6
SL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted
SL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Testing a fisheries model in Pelagia

Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.

Text A — A temporary catch limit

  1. Fish stocks near Pelagia have declined. Government economists constructed a simplified model predicting that a lower legal catch limit would increase the fish population, ceteris paribus. The model assumes unchanged sea temperature, fishing technology and illegal fishing.

  2. A catch limit was introduced in the northern region, while a similar southern region retained its existing policy. Supporters claim that the subsequent recovery proves the model is correct. Marine scientists note that water temperatures also fell in the northern region.

Text B — Evidence and policy

  1. The government describes the recorded catches and fish-stock estimates as empirical evidence. It will revise the model if future observations repeatedly conflict with its predictions.

  2. Fishing communities argue that it is unfair to sacrifice current incomes for uncertain future benefits. Environmental groups respond that protecting future generations should receive greater priority. The finance minister must combine estimates of economic consequences with value judgments.

Table 1: Estimated fish stocks and fishing income

Estimated fish stocks and annual fishing income before and after the catch-limit policy.

RegionFish stock before / 000 tonnesFish stock after / 000 tonnesIncome before / million crownsIncome after / million crowns
Northern100118240204
Southern102108238236

Table 2: Model forecast and observed northern fish stock after the policy

Model forecast and observed northern fish stock after the policy.

MeasureFish stock / thousand tonnes
Model forecast115
Observed stock118
A
I.

Define the term ceteris paribus indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).

[2]
II.

Define the term empirical evidence indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 1).

[2]
B
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage change in the northern region’s fish stock after the policy. Show your working.

[3]
II.

Using Table 2, calculate the model’s absolute forecast error for the northern fish stock.

[2]
C

Using a production possibilities curve diagram, explain the short-run choice facing Pelagia between fishing income and conservation of fish stocks (Text B, paragraph 2).

[4]
D

Using a negative externality of production diagram, explain why unrestricted commercial fishing may result in market failure (Text A, paragraph 1).

[4]
E

Using a demand and supply diagram, explain the likely effect of a binding catch limit on the market price of fish (Text A, paragraph 2).

[4]
F

Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how the fall in northern fishing income shown in Table 1 could affect the region’s real output in the short run.

[4]
G

Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate whether the evidence provides sufficient support for making Pelagia’s catch limit permanent.

[15]
Question 7
SL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted
SL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted

School-meal allocation in Valmera

Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.

Text A — Two allocation proposals

  1. Valmera has funds for 20 000 subsidized school meals each week. Proposal E allocates 5000 meals to each district, representing equal treatment across districts. Proposal N directs more meals to districts with higher measured deprivation. Proposal E emphasizes equality, while supporters of Proposal N argue that unequal treatment according to need is fairer.

  2. Economists can estimate effects on attendance and nutrition. However, deciding which distribution is fair involves equity and cannot be settled by data alone.

Text B — A pilot programme

  1. Four districts tested Proposal N. Attendance increased, although food prices and bus services changed during the pilot. Researchers therefore warn against attributing every change to the meal programme.

  2. The education minister states that Valmera should prioritize the pupils with the greatest need. Taxpayer groups support equal treatment and question the reliability of the deprivation index.

Table 1: Weekly meal allocation under the two proposals

Weekly subsidized meal allocation per district under two proposals.

DistrictProposal E / meals per district per weekProposal N / meals per district per week
North50008000
East50006000
South50004000
West50002000

Table 2: Attendance during the need-based pilot

Attendance among eligible pupils during the need-based pilot.

PeriodAverage attendance / pupilsEligible pupils / pupils
Before pilot72009000
After pilot79209000
A
I.

Define the term equality indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).

[2]
II.

Define the term equity indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).

[2]
B
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage by which North district’s allocation under Proposal N exceeds its allocation under Proposal E.

[3]
II.

Using Table 2, calculate the attendance rate after the pilot.

[2]
C

Using a Lorenz curve diagram, explain how a policy that directs greater benefits to lower-income households may affect the distribution of disposable income.

[4]
D

Using a positive consumption externality diagram, explain why subsidized school meals may be underconsumed without government intervention (Text B, paragraph 1).

[4]
E

Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how a subsidy to meal providers could increase consumption of school meals.

[4]
F

Using a PPC diagram, explain how improved pupil nutrition could affect Valmera’s productive capacity in the long run.

[4]
G

Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether Valmera should allocate school meals equally or according to measured need.

[15]
Question 8
SL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted
SL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Evaluating a congestion-charge model in Terenza

Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.

Text A — The model

  1. Terenza’s transport department developed an economic model predicting that a congestion charge would reduce peak-time car journeys by 12%. The model simplifies driver behaviour and assumes unchanged fuel prices, employment and public-transport capacity.

  2. Following the charge, car journeys fell but rail strikes also ended. The department’s original hypothesis remains open to revision because several influences changed simultaneously.

Text B — Competing judgments

  1. Businesses report faster deliveries, while some low-income commuters face higher travel costs. The mayor calls the charge efficient and fair. Opponents accept that congestion fell but reject the mayor’s fairness judgment.

  2. The department proposes further testing in another city and surveys to identify whether commuters changed routes, travel times or transport modes.

Table 1: Peak-time journeys before and after the charge

Daily peak-time journeys before and after the congestion charge.

Transport modeBefore charge / journeys per dayAfter charge / journeys per day
Car250000217500
Rail120000147000

Table 2: Model prediction and observed outcome

Model predictions and observed daily congestion-charge outcomes in Terenza.

MeasureModel predictionObserved outcome
Peak-time car-journey reduction12%12\%See Table 1
Charge revenue / million crowns per day4.504.35
A
I.

Define the term economic model indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).

[2]
II.

Define the term hypothesis indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).

[2]
B
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in peak-time car journeys.

[3]
II.

Using Table 2, calculate the percentage by which actual daily revenue was below predicted daily revenue.

[2]
C

Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how a congestion charge may reduce the number of car journeys (Text A, paragraph 1).

[4]
D

Using a negative consumption externality diagram, explain the economic justification for a congestion charge.

[4]
E

Using a demand and supply diagram for rail travel, explain the change in rail journeys shown in Table 1.

[4]
F

Using a PPC diagram, explain how reduced congestion could affect Terenza’s productive capacity over time (Text B, paragraph 1).

[4]
G

Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the reliability and usefulness of Terenza’s model for deciding whether to retain the congestion charge.

[15]

Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL

Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.

Practice exam question preview
Practice exams dashboard preview
Question 9
SL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted
SL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Behavioural saving policy in Lydora

Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.

Text A — Automatic pension enrolment

  1. Employees in Lydora traditionally had to complete a form to join a pension plan. The government introduced automatic enrolment, while allowing workers to opt out freely. Behavioural economics suggests that limited attention, inertia and framing may affect this decision.

  2. A conventional model assumes informed workers compare expected marginal benefits and costs before choosing. The pilot does not imply that every worker behaves irrationally.

Text B — Interpreting the pilot

  1. Participation rose substantially. However, critics argue that enrolled workers may reduce other forms of saving. Some also question whether a default chosen by the government respects individual preferences.

  2. The labour ministry says that automatic enrolment should be retained because it increases retirement security. This recommendation combines evidence with a value judgment about the importance of future consumption.

Table 1: Pension participation before and after automatic enrolment

Table 1: Pension participation before and after automatic enrolment in Lydora.

Employee groupNumber of employees before automatic enrolment / employeesNumber of employees after automatic enrolment / employees
Eligible employees12 00012 000
Employees participating in pension plan4 2009 000

Table 2: Average monthly saving by participating employees

Average monthly saving by participating employees before and after automatic enrolment.

Saving typeAverage monthly saving before enrolment / lydors per monthAverage monthly saving after enrolment / lydors per month
Pension saving180210
Other saving320270
A
I.

Define the term behavioural economics indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).

[2]
II.

Define the term value judgment indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 2).

[2]
B
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in the number of employees participating in the pension plan.

[3]
II.

Using Table 2, calculate the change in total average monthly saving per participating employee.

[2]
C

Using a marginal benefit and marginal cost diagram, explain the conventional model of an employee’s pension-saving decision (Text A, paragraph 2).

[4]
D

Using a demand and supply diagram for pension plans, explain the likely effect of automatic enrolment on participation (Text A, paragraph 1).

[4]
E

Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how increased aggregate saving could affect Lydora’s real output in the short run.

[4]
F

Using a demand and supply diagram for pension plans, with the employee contribution treated as the price on the vertical axis and the number of participants on the horizontal axis, explain the likely effect of automatic enrolment on participation (Text A, paragraph 1).

[4]
G

Assuming that automatic enrolment increased net saving rather than merely changing the form of saving, and that investment did not immediately rise enough to offset the resulting fall in consumption, use an AD/AS diagram to explain the possible effect on Lydora's real output in the short run.

[15]
Question 10
SL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted
SL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted

A circular textile strategy in Marova

Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.

Text A — From disposal to reuse

  1. Marova’s clothing industry imports raw fibres and sends most unwanted garments to landfill. A proposed circular economy strategy would support repair, rental, reuse and fibre recycling.

  2. Economists emphasize interdependence: production creates employment and income but also uses water, energy and land. Waste damages ecosystems, while environmental deterioration can reduce health and productive capacity.

Text B — Testing the strategy

  1. A one-year programme offered grants to textile-repair firms and introduced collection points. A model predicted lower landfill waste, assuming unchanged clothing purchases and export demand.

  2. Waste fell, but household clothing purchases also declined during an economic slowdown. Researchers state that the original prediction has received provisional support rather than proof. If reliable evidence repeatedly contradicts the prediction, refutation would require the hypothesis to be rejected or revised.

Table 1: Textile material flows

Annual flows of unwanted textiles before and after the programme.

Textile flowBefore programme / tonnesAfter programme / tonnes
Unwanted textiles5000046000
Reused or recycled1000023000
Sent to landfill4000023000

Table 2: Programme forecast and outcome

Programme forecast and outcome

MeasureForecast / estimated valueObserved / actual value
Landfill waste / tonnes2500023000
Programme cost / million marosNot provided18
Estimated environmental benefits / million maros24Not provided
A
I.

Define the term circular economy indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).

[2]
II.

Define the term refutation indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 2).

[2]
B
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in textiles sent to landfill.

[3]
II.

Using Table 2, calculate the programme’s estimated net measurable benefit.

[2]
C

Using a negative externality of production diagram, explain why sending textiles to landfill may cause market failure (Text A, paragraph 2).

[4]
D

Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how grants to repair firms could affect the market for clothing repairs (Text B, paragraph 1).

[4]
E

Using a PPC diagram, explain the opportunity cost of allocating more resources to textile recycling.

[4]
F

Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how expansion of repair and recycling activity could affect Marova’s real output in the short run.

[4]
G

Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate whether Marova should expand its circular textile strategy.

[15]
Question 11
HL • Paper 3
Hard
Calculator Permitted
HL • Paper 3
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Testing a public transport subsidy in Belland

The government of Belland wants to reduce urban traffic congestion and transport emissions. Economists hypothesize that lowering bus fares will increase bus use and reduce car journeys, ceteris paribus. A 12-week subsidy was tested in one city. The government paid bus companies the difference between the original and subsidized fares for every passenger journey.

Environmental groups support a permanent subsidy, while some taxpayers argue that public funds should instead be distributed equally among all residents. The transport minister states that the policy should be judged using both the pilot evidence and its contribution to a fair transport system.

Table 1: Weekly transport data before and during the pilot

Weekly transport data before and during the pilot in Belland.

PeriodBus fare / bellarsBus passenger journeysCar journeysTransport emissions / tonnes
Before pilot2.4050 00030 00054.0
During pilot1.8065 00024 00043.2

A survey found that employment and average household income increased during the pilot. Fuel prices also rose.

A
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage change in weekly bus passenger journeys during the pilot.

[2]
II.

Calculate the government's weekly expenditure on the bus subsidy during the pilot.

[2]
III.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in weekly transport emissions during the pilot.

[2]
IV.

Define the term positive economics.

[2]
V.

Explain the role of the ceteris paribus assumption in the hypothesis tested by the government.

[3]
VI.

Distinguish between equality and equity in the context of government transport expenditure.

[4]
VII.

Explain whether the pilot provides reliable empirical support for the hypothesis that lower bus fares increase bus use and reduce car journeys.

[5]
B

Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend whether the government of Belland should introduce a permanent public transport subsidy.

[10]
Question 12
HL • Paper 3
Hard
Calculator Permitted
HL • Paper 3
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Equality and equity in an emergency transfer programme

After severe flooding, the government of Deltora has 12 000 deltas available for one-time transfers to four representative households. One proposal distributes the budget equally. A second proposal distributes it according to assessed need, using need weights determined by household income, flood damage and the presence of dependent children.

Table 1: Household income and assessed need

Household income and assessed need for Deltora's emergency transfer programme.

HouseholdInitial income / deltasAssessed need weight
A1 0004
B2 0003
C4 0002
D8 0001

Supporters of equal transfers claim that identical treatment is fairest. Supporters of need-weighted transfers argue that fairness requires greater assistance for households suffering the greatest hardship. Economists have been asked to predict the measurable consequences of each proposal without presenting their personal views as scientific facts.

A
I.

Calculate the transfer received by each household under the equal-transfer proposal.

[2]
II.

Calculate the transfer received by Household A under the need-weighted proposal.

[2]
III.

Calculate the percentage reduction in the income range produced by the need-weighted proposal.

[3]
IV.

Define the term equality.

[2]
V.

Define the term equity.

[2]
VI.

Explain why the claim that the need-weighted proposal is fair is normative.

[3]
VII.

Construct one positive statement about the need-weighted proposal and explain why it is positive.

[3]
VIII.

Explain one limitation of using the income range to assess the fairness of the proposals.

[3]
B

Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend how Deltora should distribute the emergency transfer budget.

[10]

Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL

Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.

Practice exam question preview
Practice exams dashboard preview
Question 13
SL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator
SL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator

A

Explain how marginal analysis may be used by a consumer or firm to make an economic decision.

[10]
B

Using real-world examples, discuss whether evidence from behavioural economics makes marginal analysis less useful for explaining economic choices.

[15]
Question 14
HL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator
HL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator

A

Explain why an observed correlation between two economic variables may not provide reliable evidence of causation.

[10]
B

Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that economic policies should only be adopted when there is strong evidence of a causal relationship.

[15]
Question 15
SL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted
SL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Market coordination in Arken’s bread sector

Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.

Text A — Removing licensing controls

  1. Arken previously restricted the number of bakeries. The government removed most licensing requirements, arguing that competition and self-interested decisions would coordinate production through the invisible hand.

  2. The reform reflects a laissez-faire approach. Entry increased and average bread prices fell. However, several rural communities still have only one bakery, and nutrition groups argue that low-income households cannot always express their needs through market demand.

Text B — Interpreting the reform

  1. Supporters say falling prices demonstrate successful market coordination. Critics identify pollution from delivery vehicles, unequal access and imperfect information about bread quality.

  2. The government is considering emissions charges, rural bakery grants and mandatory nutritional labels. Economists disagree about whether these measures correct specific market failures or weaken beneficial competition.

Table 1: Bakery market indicators

Bakery market indicators before and after reform

PeriodLicensed bakeriesAverage bread price / arkens per loaf
Before reform40030
After reform52027

Table 2: Urban and rural access after reform

Households within 2 km of a bakery after reform

AreaBefore reform (%)After reform (%)
Urban households88%96%
Rural households42%48%
A
I.

Define the term invisible hand indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).

[2]
II.

Define the term laissez-faire indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).

[2]
B
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in the number of licensed bakeries.

[3]
II.

Using Table 2, calculate the percentage-point change in rural household access.

[2]
C

Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how increased entry of bakeries may have reduced the price of bread (Text A, paragraph 2).

[4]
D

Using a negative externality of production diagram, explain why bakery delivery emissions may justify government intervention (Text B, paragraph 1).

[4]
E

Using a subsidy diagram, explain how a grant to rural bakeries could affect rural access to bread (Text B, paragraph 2).

[4]
F

Using a PPC diagram, explain how greater competition could affect Arken’s productive capacity over time.

[4]
G

Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss the extent to which laissez-faire policies have improved economic outcomes in Arken’s bread sector.

[15]
Question 16
HL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted
HL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Competing explanations of Belvar’s recession

Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.

Text A — A demand collapse

  1. After a financial shock, private investment and consumption fell sharply. Economists influenced by Keynesian economics argued that inadequate aggregate expenditure could keep Belvar below full employment and recommended temporary public investment.

  2. Other economists referred to Say’s law, arguing that production generates income capable of creating demand and that flexible markets would eventually restore employment. They warned that borrowing-financed spending might crowd out private investment.

Text B — Evidence after intervention

  1. Belvar introduced a two-year infrastructure programme. Output recovered faster than one forecast predicted, but exports also increased because trading partners recovered. Interest rates remained low because the central bank expanded liquidity.

  2. The finance ministry claims the evidence proves the Keynesian paradigm. Independent researchers argue that one episode can support a theory without proving universal validity. Historical conditions, institutions and policy interactions matter.

Table 1 gives Belvar’s macroeconomic indicators.

Table 1: Macroeconomic indicators in Belvar

PeriodReal GDP indexUnemployment rate / %
Before recession1005
Year 19211
Year 2987

Table 2 gives the Year 2 forecasts and observed macroeconomic outcomes.

Year 2 forecasts and observed macroeconomic outcomes in Belvar.

IndicatorKeynesian forecastMarket-adjustment forecastObserved outcome
Real GDP index979498
Unemployment rate / %8107
A
I.

Define Keynesian economics indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).

[2]
II.

Define Say’s law indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).

[2]
B
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in Belvar’s real GDP index from Year 1 to Year 2.

[3]
II.

Using Table 2, calculate the absolute real GDP forecast error for each school of thought in Year 2.

[2]
C

Using an AD/AS diagram, explain the Keynesian interpretation of Belvar’s recession (Text A, paragraph 1).

[4]
D

Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how the infrastructure programme could increase Belvar’s output in the short run.

[4]
E

Using a loanable-funds diagram, explain the crowding-out concern described in Text A, paragraph 2.

[4]
F

Using a PPC diagram, explain how productive infrastructure could affect Belvar’s long-run output.

[4]
G

Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate whether Belvar’s experience justifies a shift toward Keynesian economic thought.

[15]

Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL

Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.

Practice exam question preview
Practice exams dashboard preview
Question 17
HL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted
HL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Inflation policy and monetarist ideas in Ordelia

Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.

Text A — A change in policy framework

  1. Ordelia experienced persistently high inflation after rapid growth of bank credit and the money supply. Advisers influenced by the monetarist school recommended slower monetary growth and less frequent discretionary fiscal intervention.

  2. New classical advisers also emphasized rational responses and market adjustment. They argued that predictable rules would influence expectations more effectively than repeated policy surprises.

Text B — Interpreting disinflation

  1. The central bank adopted a money-growth target. Inflation subsequently fell, but global energy prices also declined and agricultural output recovered after a drought.

  2. The government states that the outcome confirms the monetarist theory. Critics say a valid theory is supported by connected reasoning and evidence, but agreement with one prediction does not prove that it applies in every period.

Table 1: Money and price indicators

Annual money-supply growth and inflation before and after the policy rule.

PeriodMoney-supply growth / % per yearInflation rate / %
Before the rule1814
After the rule76

Table 2: Inflation forecasts and outcome

Inflation forecasts, outcome, money-growth path and reported policy rate in Ordelia.

MeasureBefore targetAfter target
Money-supply growth / %187
Policy interest rate / % (reported; not equilibrium)48
Monetarist inflation forecast / %—7
Unchanged-policy inflation forecast / %—10
Observed inflation rate / %—6
A
I.

Define the monetarist school indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).

[2]
II.

Define the term theory indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 2).

[2]
B
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in Ordelia’s inflation rate.

[3]
II.

Using Table 2, calculate the absolute inflation forecast error for each forecast.

[2]
C

Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how slower money growth may reduce demand-pull inflation (Text A, paragraph 1).

[4]
D

Using a money-market diagram, explain how contraction of money-supply growth could raise Ordelia’s interest rate (Table 2).

[4]
E

Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how recovery of agricultural output could have reduced inflation (Text B, paragraph 1).

[4]
F

Using a PPC diagram, explain how the end of the drought may affect Ordelia’s production possibilities.

[4]
G

Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether Ordelia’s disinflation provides strong empirical support for monetarist policy.

[15]
Question 18
HL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted
HL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Automation and competing views in Karsia

Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.

Text A — Factory automation

  1. A large manufacturing company introduced robots, raising output per worker and profits. Classical microeconomic analysis emphasizes incentives, productivity and decisions at the margin.

  2. A union influenced by Marxism argues that ownership of productive resources gives shareholders power over workers and that automation may intensify conflict over how income is distributed.

Text B — Evidence and interpretation

  1. The company says higher productivity will eventually raise wages and create technical jobs. The union notes that production-worker employment fell and claims the evidence refutes the company’s prediction.

  2. Economists caution that the outcome may differ between the short run and long run. They also distinguish measured inequality from equity, since deciding whether the resulting distribution is fair requires a normative standard.

Table 1: Factory outcomes before and after automation

Factory outcomes before and after automation in Karsia.

PeriodAnnual output / unitsProduction workersAverage annual wage / kars
Before automation$200,000$1,000$36,000
After automation$270,000$750$37,800

Table 2: Distribution of factory income

Distribution of factory income before and after automation.

Income componentBefore automation / million karsAfter automation / million kars
Total wages36.0028.35
Profits24.0040.65
A
I.

Define Marxism indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).

[2]
II.

Define the term equity indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 2).

[2]
B
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage change in output per production worker following automation.

[3]
II.

Using Table 2, calculate labour’s share of the combined wage-and-profit income after automation.

[2]
C

Using a labour-market diagram, explain the short-run effect of labour-replacing automation on production-worker employment (Text B, paragraph 1).

[4]
D

Using a PPC diagram, explain how automation may affect Karsia’s productive capacity.

[4]
E

Using a Lorenz curve diagram, explain how a transfer of income from wages to profits could affect measured income inequality (Table 2).

[4]
F

Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how higher investment in automation may affect real output in the short run.

[4]
G

Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the usefulness of classical and Marxist economic thought for explaining the effects of automation in Karsia.

[15]
Question 19
HL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted
HL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Behavioural lending disclosures in Novera

Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.

Text A — Presenting loan costs

  1. Novera requires lenders to state annual interest rates. A new pilot also presents the total repayment amount in large print and includes a comparison with a cheaper loan. Researchers studying framing and limited attention describe this as an application of behavioural economics.

  2. The conventional model assumes consumers use available information to choose the loan that maximizes expected utility. Behavioural researchers do not claim that every borrower makes the same error.

Text B — Pilot results

  1. High-cost borrowing fell in pilot branches. However, the pilot branches also received additional staff training, and borrowers may have differed from those elsewhere.

  2. Consumer groups recommend national implementation. Lenders argue that prominent warnings may discourage beneficial emergency borrowing and that government-selected comparisons can influence choices according to official values.

Table 1: Borrowing decisions in the pilot

Borrowing decisions before and after the disclosure change.

PeriodLoan applicants / numberHigh-cost loans chosen / numberLower-cost loans chosen / number
Before disclosure600024002100
After disclosure600015003000

Table 2: Repayment outcomes

Repayment outcomes for a representative 1000-nover loan.

Loan typeAverage total repayment / novers (1000-nover loan)Late-payment rate / %
High-cost loan138018
Lower-cost loan116010
A
I.

Define behavioural economics indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).

[2]
II.

Define the term utility indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).

[2]
B
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in the number of applicants choosing high-cost loans.

[3]
II.

Using Table 2, calculate the percentage saving in total repayment from choosing the lower-cost rather than the high-cost loan.

[2]
C

Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how clearer disclosure may affect demand for high-cost loans (Text A, paragraph 1).

[4]
D

Using a marginal benefit and marginal cost diagram, explain the conventional model of a borrower’s loan decision (Text A, paragraph 2).

[4]
E

Using an information-failure diagram, explain why borrowers may consume an excessive quantity of high-cost credit.

[4]
F

Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how a large reduction in household borrowing could affect Novera’s real output in the short run.

[4]
G

Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether Novera should make the behavioural lending disclosure compulsory nationwide.

[15]
Question 20
HL • Paper 3
Hard
Calculator Permitted
HL • Paper 3
Hard
Calculator Permitted

A behavioural electricity-saving trial in Norland

Norland's energy ministry traditionally required households to apply actively for a renewable-electricity plan. Behavioural economists suggested changing the choice architecture so that households would be enrolled automatically but could opt out at no cost.

The ministry randomly assigned similar households to a control group, which retained active enrolment, and a treatment group, which received automatic enrolment. It hypothesized that the default would increase renewable-plan participation and reduce electricity consumption. Weather conditions and regulated electricity prices were similar for both groups during the trial.

Table 1: Results of the household trial

Household trial outcomes before and during the three-month trial.

GroupHouseholdsAverage electricity consumption before / kWh per household per monthAverage electricity consumption during / kWh per household per monthParticipation before / %Participation during / %
Control2 0004003921821
Automatic enrolment2 0004203571968

The trial lasted three months. Some officials argue that the results refute the conventional assumption that households always choose plans using complete information and fully rational calculation.

A
I.

Calculate the percentage decrease in the treatment group's average monthly electricity consumption.

[2]
II.

Using a difference-in-differences method, determine the estimated effect of the automatic-enrolment policy on average monthly electricity consumption per household.

[3]
III.

Define the term behavioural economics.

[2]
IV.

State a testable hypothesis concerning the effect of automatic enrolment on renewable-plan participation.

[2]
V.

Explain why random assignment strengthens the ministry's test of the hypothesis.

[3]
VI.

Explain whether the trial refutes the conventional model of rational household choice.

[3]
VII.

Explain two limitations of using this trial to predict the nationwide effects of automatic enrolment.

[5]
B

Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend whether Norland should introduce automatic enrolment in renewable-electricity plans nationwide.

[10]

Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL

Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.

Practice exam question preview
Practice exams dashboard preview
Question 21
HL • Paper 3
Hard
Calculator Permitted
HL • Paper 3
Hard
Calculator Permitted

A repair programme and the circular economy in Arandia

Arandia discards many electronic devices even when they could be repaired. The government piloted grants for community repair centres. Its objective was to keep products and materials in use, reduce the extraction of new resources and develop evidence about the most appropriate scale of the programme.

Economists estimated the total social benefit and total programme cost at three possible scales. These estimates include measured resource savings and administrative costs, but non-market environmental benefits are difficult to value.

Table 1: Estimated annual benefits and costs at alternative programme scales

Estimated annual social benefits and programme costs at alternative repair scales.

Repair scale / devices per yearTotal social benefit / arinsTotal programme cost / arins
1 00090 00060 000
2 000170 000130 000
3 000225 000210 000

Table 2: Results at the medium scale

Annual results of the repair-centre programme at the medium scale.

MeasureAnnual result
Devices accepted2 000 devices
Devices successfully repaired1 400 devices
Potentially replaceable virgin material identified1 200 kg
Virgin-material use avoided840 kg
A
I.

Using Table 2, calculate the percentage of accepted devices that were successfully repaired.

[2]
II.

Calculate the percentage of potentially replaceable virgin material whose use was avoided.

[2]
III.

Using Table 1, determine the programme scale supported by marginal analysis.

[3]
IV.

Define the term marginal analysis.

[2]
V.

Explain how the repair programme is consistent with the concept of a circular economy.

[3]
VI.

Explain two assumptions underlying the estimates in Table 1.

[4]
VII.

Explain why the government's estimate of the preferred programme scale should remain open to revision.

[4]
B

Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend how the government of Arandia should develop its repair-centre programme.

[10]
Question 22
HL • Paper 3
Hard
Calculator Permitted
HL • Paper 3
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Competing economic ideas during a recession in Costavia

Costavia entered a recession after a sharp fall in private expenditure. Economists influenced by classical ideas predicted that flexible markets would restore output without a large fiscal intervention. Keynesian economists argued that inadequate aggregate expenditure could keep the economy below full employment and supported temporary government spending.

The government introduced a one-year public investment programme at the beginning of Year 2. The programme was concentrated in regions with high unemployment.

Table 1: Output and unemployment

Costavia's real output index and unemployment rate by year.

YearReal output indexUnemployment rate / %
Pre-recession year1005
Year 19210
Year 2977

Table 2: Predictions made at the end of Year 1

End-of-Year 1 forecasts for Year 2 in Costavia.

Forecast approachReal output index, Year 2Unemployment rate in Year 2 / %
Classical market-adjustment968
Keynesian (with investment programme)986.5

Monetarist economists accepted that the recession was serious but warned that frequent discretionary intervention could create instability and weaken confidence. Government officials must decide whether to renew the investment programme for another year.

A
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in real output between the pre-recession year and Year 1.

[2]
II.

Calculate the percentage increase in the real output index between Year 1 and Year 2.

[2]
III.

Using Tables 1 and 2, calculate the absolute forecast error for Year 2 unemployment for each forecast.

[2]
IV.

Define the term Keynesian economics.

[2]
V.

Explain how the recession challenged the proposition known as Say's law.

[3]
VI.

Compare the Keynesian and monetarist approaches to stabilization policy described in the stimulus.

[4]
VII.

Explain why the Year 2 evidence does not prove that the Keynesian explanation is universally correct.

[3]
VIII.

Explain one way in which historical context can influence the development of economic thought.

[2]
B

Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend whether Costavia should renew the public investment programme for another year.

[10]
Question 23
HL • Paper 3
Hard
Calculator Permitted
HL • Paper 3
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Testing a packaging levy in Estara

Estara has traditionally followed a linear pattern in which packaging materials are extracted, used and discarded. The government wants to encourage producers to design reusable packaging and introduced a one-year levy pilot. Revenue from the levy financed collection points and consumer reminders.

Before the pilot, economists constructed a model predicting how the levy would affect producer adoption of reusable packaging and annual packaging waste. The model assumed stable consumer preferences, material prices and production technology.

Table 1: Model predictions and pilot outcomes

Packaging levy model predictions and pilot outcomes in Estara.

MeasureBaselineModel with levyPilot outcome
Reusable-packaging adoption rate / %204538
Annual packaging waste / tonnes$10,000$7,000$7,600
Administrative cost / million estaras—1.21.5

Consumer surveys conducted after the pilot found that reminders placed beside disposal bins increased returns of reusable packaging. Psychologists advising the government argued that limited attention and habits should be incorporated into the economic model.

A
I.

Calculate the increase in the reusable-packaging adoption rate between the baseline and the actual pilot outcome, in percentage points.

[2]
II.

Calculate the percentage increase in the reusable-packaging adoption rate between the baseline and the actual pilot outcome.

[2]
III.

Calculate the percentage decrease in annual packaging waste between the baseline and the actual pilot outcome.

[2]
IV.

Calculate the absolute forecast error for annual packaging waste.

[2]
V.

Define the term economic model.

[2]
VI.

Explain how the pilot evidence should affect the government's model.

[3]
VII.

Explain how dialogue with psychology could improve the economic analysis of the levy.

[3]
VIII.

Explain the interdependencies between the economy, society and the environment illustrated by Estara's packaging policy.

[4]
B

Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend how the government of Estara should develop its packaging policy after the pilot.

[10]
Question 24
HL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator
HL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator

A

Explain how value judgments may influence the selection and application of an economic model.

[10]
B

Using real-world examples, discuss whether the distinction between positive and normative economics can be maintained in policy debates.

[15]

Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL

Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.

Practice exam question preview
Practice exams dashboard preview
Question 25
HL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator
HL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator

A

Explain how the experience of the Great Depression contributed to the Keynesian challenge to classical macroeconomic thought.

[10]
B

Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that economic crises are the main cause of changes in economic thought.

[15]
Question 26
HL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator
HL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator

A

Explain how monetarist and new classical thought challenged the Keynesian case for discretionary macroeconomic stabilization policy.

[10]
B

Using real-world examples, discuss whether the historical context in which an economic school of thought develops limits its relevance to current policy making.

[15]
Question 27
HL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator
HL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator

A

Explain how the Marxist critique differed from classical economic thought in its interpretation of capitalism.

[10]
B

Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that individual economists are the main cause of paradigm shifts in economics.

[15]
Question 28
HL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator
HL • Paper 1
Hard
Non Calculator

A

Explain how interdependence between the economy, society and the natural environment provides a case for moving towards a circular economy.

[10]
B

Using real-world examples, discuss whether a transition towards a circular economy requires greater government intervention.

[15]

Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL

Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.

Practice exam question preview
Practice exams dashboard preview
Question 29
HL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted
HL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Modelling reusable construction materials in Elaria

Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.

Text A — A materials passport

  1. Elaria requires new public buildings to record components in digital “materials passports” so that steel, glass and timber can later be reused. The policy reflects awareness of interdependence between the economy, society and environment.

  2. Economists constructed a model predicting material recovery. The model assumes stable demolition rates and unchanged prices for virgin materials. These assumptions simplify reality but allow a testable positive statement: the passport requirement will increase the recovery rate.

Text B — Evidence and social priorities

  1. Recovery increased, although virgin steel prices also rose. Researchers therefore cannot isolate the policy’s effect with certainty. They recommend revising the model and collecting evidence from private construction.

  2. The minister states that preserving resources for future generations is more important than minimizing present construction costs. This is a normative statement, even though evidence can estimate the costs and environmental benefits.

Table 1: Construction-material recovery

Construction-material availability and recovery before and after the materials-passport policy.

PeriodReusable material available / tonnesMaterial recovered / tonnes
Before policy8000024000
After policy9000040500

Table 2: Predicted and observed programme outcomes

Predicted and observed programme outcomes

OutcomeValue
Predicted recovery rate42%42\%
Observed recovery rate45%45\%
Additional construction costs32 million elars
Estimated environmental benefits38 million elars
A
I.

Define a positive statement indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).

[2]
II.

Define a normative statement indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 2).

[2]
B
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in the quantity of construction material recovered.

[3]
II.

Using Table 2, calculate the net estimated measurable benefit of the programme.

[2]
C

Using a negative externality of production diagram, explain why the use of virgin construction materials may result in market failure.

[4]
D

Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how higher virgin-steel prices could increase demand for recovered steel (Text B, paragraph 1).

[4]
E

Using a PPC diagram, explain the present opportunity cost of devoting more resources to recovering construction materials.

[4]
F

Using a PPC diagram, explain how preserving finite resources could affect Elaria’s future production possibilities.

[4]
G

Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate whether Elaria’s evidence justifies extending materials passports to private buildings.

[15]
Question 30
HL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted
HL • Paper 2
Hard
Calculator Permitted

Economic ideas after a food crisis in Santorra

Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.

Text A — Confidence in market adjustment

  1. Santorra previously followed policies influenced by classical ideas. Officials expected flexible prices and private exchange to direct food toward its highest-valued uses. After a crop failure, food prices rose sharply and malnutrition increased among households with low purchasing power.

  2. The crisis led to proposals for public grain purchases, transfers and temporary price support. This illustrates how historical events may challenge an established paradigm, a broad framework shaping accepted questions and explanations.

Text B — Marginal and social considerations

  1. Some economists recommend expanding food transfers until the additional social benefit equals the additional cost. This applies marginal analysis rather than comparing total benefits and costs alone.

  2. Others argue that market exchange remains important for generating supply incentives. Behavioural researchers add that stress and limited attention may influence household choices during crises. Environmental researchers warn that intensive cultivation may damage soil and future output.

Table 1: Food-market and social indicators

Food-market and social indicators before and after the crop failure in Santorra.

IndicatorAnnual staple consumption by lowest-income fifth / kg per householdMalnutrition rate / %
Staple-food price index100160
Annual staple consumption by lowest-income fifth [kg per household]300225
Malnutrition rate [%]1221

Table 2: Estimated transfer-programme scales

Estimated marginal benefits and costs of successive food-transfer programme expansions.

Programme expansionMarginal social benefit / million santorsMarginal cost / million santors
Expansion 19050
Expansion 26060
Expansion 33555
A
I.

Define the term paradigm indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).

[2]
II.

Define marginal analysis indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 1).

[2]
B
I.

Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in annual staple consumption by the lowest-income fifth.

[3]
II.

Using Table 2 and marginal analysis, determine the programme scale Santorra should select.

[2]
C

Using a demand and supply diagram, explain the increase in Santorra’s staple-food price following the crop failure (Text A, paragraph 1).

[4]
D

Using a maximum-price diagram, explain how a binding food-price ceiling could affect the staple-food market.

[4]
E

Using a PPC diagram, explain how soil degradation could affect Santorra’s future productive capacity (Text B, paragraph 2).

[4]
F

Using a positive consumption externality diagram, explain why food transfers that improve child nutrition may generate social benefits beyond the recipient household.

[4]
G

Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether Santorra’s food crisis justifies a major shift away from market-oriented economic thought.

[15]

1.1 What is economics?