Explain how economists use hypotheses, models and empirical evidence to develop economic theories.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that improved empirical evidence will enable economists to make accurate predictions.
Explain the role of the ceteris paribus assumption in an economic model of demand.
Using real-world examples, discuss whether simplifying assumptions make economic models less useful for policy making.
Explain the distinction between positive and normative economics in the analysis of a government subsidy.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that economic evidence should determine whether a government introduces a subsidy.
Explain why greater equality of income does not necessarily result in greater equity.
Using real-world examples, discuss whether progressive taxation is an equitable way to redistribute income.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Explain how self-interest and competition may coordinate economic activity according to Adam Smith's idea of the invisible hand.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that laissez-faire markets provide the most effective way to coordinate economic activity.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Fish stocks near Pelagia have declined. Government economists constructed a simplified model predicting that a lower legal catch limit would increase the fish population, ceteris paribus. The model assumes unchanged sea temperature, fishing technology and illegal fishing.
A catch limit was introduced in the northern region, while a similar southern region retained its existing policy. Supporters claim that the subsequent recovery proves the model is correct. Marine scientists note that water temperatures also fell in the northern region.
The government describes the recorded catches and fish-stock estimates as empirical evidence. It will revise the model if future observations repeatedly conflict with its predictions.
Fishing communities argue that it is unfair to sacrifice current incomes for uncertain future benefits. Environmental groups respond that protecting future generations should receive greater priority. The finance minister must combine estimates of economic consequences with value judgments.
Estimated fish stocks and annual fishing income before and after the catch-limit policy.
| Region | Fish stock before / 000 tonnes | Fish stock after / 000 tonnes | Income before / million crowns | Income after / million crowns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern | 100 | 118 | 240 | 204 |
| Southern | 102 | 108 | 238 | 236 |
Model forecast and observed northern fish stock after the policy.
| Measure | Fish stock / thousand tonnes |
|---|---|
| Model forecast | 115 |
| Observed stock | 118 |
Define the term ceteris paribus indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term empirical evidence indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage change in the northern region’s fish stock after the policy. Show your working.
Using Table 2, calculate the model’s absolute forecast error for the northern fish stock.
Using a production possibilities curve diagram, explain the short-run choice facing Pelagia between fishing income and conservation of fish stocks (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using a negative externality of production diagram, explain why unrestricted commercial fishing may result in market failure (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain the likely effect of a binding catch limit on the market price of fish (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how the fall in northern fishing income shown in Table 1 could affect the region’s real output in the short run.
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate whether the evidence provides sufficient support for making Pelagia’s catch limit permanent.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Valmera has funds for 20 000 subsidized school meals each week. Proposal E allocates 5000 meals to each district, representing equal treatment across districts. Proposal N directs more meals to districts with higher measured deprivation. Proposal E emphasizes equality, while supporters of Proposal N argue that unequal treatment according to need is fairer.
Economists can estimate effects on attendance and nutrition. However, deciding which distribution is fair involves equity and cannot be settled by data alone.
Four districts tested Proposal N. Attendance increased, although food prices and bus services changed during the pilot. Researchers therefore warn against attributing every change to the meal programme.
The education minister states that Valmera should prioritize the pupils with the greatest need. Taxpayer groups support equal treatment and question the reliability of the deprivation index.
Weekly subsidized meal allocation per district under two proposals.
| District | Proposal E / meals per district per week | Proposal N / meals per district per week |
|---|---|---|
| North | 5000 | 8000 |
| East | 5000 | 6000 |
| South | 5000 | 4000 |
| West | 5000 | 2000 |
Attendance among eligible pupils during the need-based pilot.
| Period | Average attendance / pupils | Eligible pupils / pupils |
|---|---|---|
| Before pilot | 7200 | 9000 |
| After pilot | 7920 | 9000 |
Define the term equality indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term equity indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage by which North district’s allocation under Proposal N exceeds its allocation under Proposal E.
Using Table 2, calculate the attendance rate after the pilot.
Using a Lorenz curve diagram, explain how a policy that directs greater benefits to lower-income households may affect the distribution of disposable income.
Using a positive consumption externality diagram, explain why subsidized school meals may be underconsumed without government intervention (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how a subsidy to meal providers could increase consumption of school meals.
Using a PPC diagram, explain how improved pupil nutrition could affect Valmera’s productive capacity in the long run.
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether Valmera should allocate school meals equally or according to measured need.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Terenza’s transport department developed an economic model predicting that a congestion charge would reduce peak-time car journeys by 12%. The model simplifies driver behaviour and assumes unchanged fuel prices, employment and public-transport capacity.
Following the charge, car journeys fell but rail strikes also ended. The department’s original hypothesis remains open to revision because several influences changed simultaneously.
Businesses report faster deliveries, while some low-income commuters face higher travel costs. The mayor calls the charge efficient and fair. Opponents accept that congestion fell but reject the mayor’s fairness judgment.
The department proposes further testing in another city and surveys to identify whether commuters changed routes, travel times or transport modes.
Daily peak-time journeys before and after the congestion charge.
| Transport mode | Before charge / journeys per day | After charge / journeys per day |
|---|---|---|
| Car | 250000 | 217500 |
| Rail | 120000 | 147000 |
Model predictions and observed daily congestion-charge outcomes in Terenza.
| Measure | Model prediction | Observed outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Peak-time car-journey reduction | See Table 1 | |
| Charge revenue / million crowns per day | 4.50 | 4.35 |
Define the term economic model indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term hypothesis indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in peak-time car journeys.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage by which actual daily revenue was below predicted daily revenue.
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how a congestion charge may reduce the number of car journeys (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using a negative consumption externality diagram, explain the economic justification for a congestion charge.
Using a demand and supply diagram for rail travel, explain the change in rail journeys shown in Table 1.
Using a PPC diagram, explain how reduced congestion could affect Terenza’s productive capacity over time (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the reliability and usefulness of Terenza’s model for deciding whether to retain the congestion charge.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Employees in Lydora traditionally had to complete a form to join a pension plan. The government introduced automatic enrolment, while allowing workers to opt out freely. Behavioural economics suggests that limited attention, inertia and framing may affect this decision.
A conventional model assumes informed workers compare expected marginal benefits and costs before choosing. The pilot does not imply that every worker behaves irrationally.
Participation rose substantially. However, critics argue that enrolled workers may reduce other forms of saving. Some also question whether a default chosen by the government respects individual preferences.
The labour ministry says that automatic enrolment should be retained because it increases retirement security. This recommendation combines evidence with a value judgment about the importance of future consumption.
Table 1: Pension participation before and after automatic enrolment in Lydora.
| Employee group | Number of employees before automatic enrolment / employees | Number of employees after automatic enrolment / employees |
|---|---|---|
| Eligible employees | 12 000 | 12 000 |
| Employees participating in pension plan | 4 200 | 9 000 |
Average monthly saving by participating employees before and after automatic enrolment.
| Saving type | Average monthly saving before enrolment / lydors per month | Average monthly saving after enrolment / lydors per month |
|---|---|---|
| Pension saving | 180 | 210 |
| Other saving | 320 | 270 |
Define the term behavioural economics indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term value judgment indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in the number of employees participating in the pension plan.
Using Table 2, calculate the change in total average monthly saving per participating employee.
Using a marginal benefit and marginal cost diagram, explain the conventional model of an employee’s pension-saving decision (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using a demand and supply diagram for pension plans, explain the likely effect of automatic enrolment on participation (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how increased aggregate saving could affect Lydora’s real output in the short run.
Using a demand and supply diagram for pension plans, with the employee contribution treated as the price on the vertical axis and the number of participants on the horizontal axis, explain the likely effect of automatic enrolment on participation (Text A, paragraph 1).
Assuming that automatic enrolment increased net saving rather than merely changing the form of saving, and that investment did not immediately rise enough to offset the resulting fall in consumption, use an AD/AS diagram to explain the possible effect on Lydora's real output in the short run.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Marova’s clothing industry imports raw fibres and sends most unwanted garments to landfill. A proposed circular economy strategy would support repair, rental, reuse and fibre recycling.
Economists emphasize interdependence: production creates employment and income but also uses water, energy and land. Waste damages ecosystems, while environmental deterioration can reduce health and productive capacity.
A one-year programme offered grants to textile-repair firms and introduced collection points. A model predicted lower landfill waste, assuming unchanged clothing purchases and export demand.
Waste fell, but household clothing purchases also declined during an economic slowdown. Researchers state that the original prediction has received provisional support rather than proof. If reliable evidence repeatedly contradicts the prediction, refutation would require the hypothesis to be rejected or revised.
Annual flows of unwanted textiles before and after the programme.
| Textile flow | Before programme / tonnes | After programme / tonnes |
|---|---|---|
| Unwanted textiles | 50000 | 46000 |
| Reused or recycled | 10000 | 23000 |
| Sent to landfill | 40000 | 23000 |
Programme forecast and outcome
| Measure | Forecast / estimated value | Observed / actual value |
|---|---|---|
| Landfill waste / tonnes | 25000 | 23000 |
| Programme cost / million maros | Not provided | 18 |
| Estimated environmental benefits / million maros | 24 | Not provided |
Define the term circular economy indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term refutation indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in textiles sent to landfill.
Using Table 2, calculate the programme’s estimated net measurable benefit.
Using a negative externality of production diagram, explain why sending textiles to landfill may cause market failure (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how grants to repair firms could affect the market for clothing repairs (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a PPC diagram, explain the opportunity cost of allocating more resources to textile recycling.
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how expansion of repair and recycling activity could affect Marova’s real output in the short run.
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate whether Marova should expand its circular textile strategy.
The government of Belland wants to reduce urban traffic congestion and transport emissions. Economists hypothesize that lowering bus fares will increase bus use and reduce car journeys, ceteris paribus. A 12-week subsidy was tested in one city. The government paid bus companies the difference between the original and subsidized fares for every passenger journey.
Environmental groups support a permanent subsidy, while some taxpayers argue that public funds should instead be distributed equally among all residents. The transport minister states that the policy should be judged using both the pilot evidence and its contribution to a fair transport system.
Weekly transport data before and during the pilot in Belland.
| Period | Bus fare / bellars | Bus passenger journeys | Car journeys | Transport emissions / tonnes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before pilot | 2.40 | 50 000 | 30 000 | 54.0 |
| During pilot | 1.80 | 65 000 | 24 000 | 43.2 |
A survey found that employment and average household income increased during the pilot. Fuel prices also rose.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage change in weekly bus passenger journeys during the pilot.
Calculate the government's weekly expenditure on the bus subsidy during the pilot.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in weekly transport emissions during the pilot.
Define the term positive economics.
Explain the role of the ceteris paribus assumption in the hypothesis tested by the government.
Distinguish between equality and equity in the context of government transport expenditure.
Explain whether the pilot provides reliable empirical support for the hypothesis that lower bus fares increase bus use and reduce car journeys.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend whether the government of Belland should introduce a permanent public transport subsidy.
After severe flooding, the government of Deltora has 12 000 deltas available for one-time transfers to four representative households. One proposal distributes the budget equally. A second proposal distributes it according to assessed need, using need weights determined by household income, flood damage and the presence of dependent children.
Household income and assessed need for Deltora's emergency transfer programme.
| Household | Initial income / deltas | Assessed need weight |
|---|---|---|
| A | 1 000 | 4 |
| B | 2 000 | 3 |
| C | 4 000 | 2 |
| D | 8 000 | 1 |
Supporters of equal transfers claim that identical treatment is fairest. Supporters of need-weighted transfers argue that fairness requires greater assistance for households suffering the greatest hardship. Economists have been asked to predict the measurable consequences of each proposal without presenting their personal views as scientific facts.
Calculate the transfer received by each household under the equal-transfer proposal.
Calculate the transfer received by Household A under the need-weighted proposal.
Calculate the percentage reduction in the income range produced by the need-weighted proposal.
Define the term equality.
Define the term equity.
Explain why the claim that the need-weighted proposal is fair is normative.
Construct one positive statement about the need-weighted proposal and explain why it is positive.
Explain one limitation of using the income range to assess the fairness of the proposals.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend how Deltora should distribute the emergency transfer budget.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Explain how marginal analysis may be used by a consumer or firm to make an economic decision.
Using real-world examples, discuss whether evidence from behavioural economics makes marginal analysis less useful for explaining economic choices.
Explain why an observed correlation between two economic variables may not provide reliable evidence of causation.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that economic policies should only be adopted when there is strong evidence of a causal relationship.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Arken previously restricted the number of bakeries. The government removed most licensing requirements, arguing that competition and self-interested decisions would coordinate production through the invisible hand.
The reform reflects a laissez-faire approach. Entry increased and average bread prices fell. However, several rural communities still have only one bakery, and nutrition groups argue that low-income households cannot always express their needs through market demand.
Supporters say falling prices demonstrate successful market coordination. Critics identify pollution from delivery vehicles, unequal access and imperfect information about bread quality.
The government is considering emissions charges, rural bakery grants and mandatory nutritional labels. Economists disagree about whether these measures correct specific market failures or weaken beneficial competition.
Bakery market indicators before and after reform
| Period | Licensed bakeries | Average bread price / arkens per loaf |
|---|---|---|
| Before reform | 400 | 30 |
| After reform | 520 | 27 |
Households within 2 km of a bakery after reform
| Area | Before reform (%) | After reform (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Urban households | 88% | 96% |
| Rural households | 42% | 48% |
Define the term invisible hand indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term laissez-faire indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in the number of licensed bakeries.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage-point change in rural household access.
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how increased entry of bakeries may have reduced the price of bread (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using a negative externality of production diagram, explain why bakery delivery emissions may justify government intervention (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a subsidy diagram, explain how a grant to rural bakeries could affect rural access to bread (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using a PPC diagram, explain how greater competition could affect Arken’s productive capacity over time.
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss the extent to which laissez-faire policies have improved economic outcomes in Arken’s bread sector.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
After a financial shock, private investment and consumption fell sharply. Economists influenced by Keynesian economics argued that inadequate aggregate expenditure could keep Belvar below full employment and recommended temporary public investment.
Other economists referred to Say’s law, arguing that production generates income capable of creating demand and that flexible markets would eventually restore employment. They warned that borrowing-financed spending might crowd out private investment.
Belvar introduced a two-year infrastructure programme. Output recovered faster than one forecast predicted, but exports also increased because trading partners recovered. Interest rates remained low because the central bank expanded liquidity.
The finance ministry claims the evidence proves the Keynesian paradigm. Independent researchers argue that one episode can support a theory without proving universal validity. Historical conditions, institutions and policy interactions matter.
Table 1 gives Belvar’s macroeconomic indicators.
Table 1: Macroeconomic indicators in Belvar
| Period | Real GDP index | Unemployment rate / % |
|---|---|---|
| Before recession | 100 | 5 |
| Year 1 | 92 | 11 |
| Year 2 | 98 | 7 |
Table 2 gives the Year 2 forecasts and observed macroeconomic outcomes.
Year 2 forecasts and observed macroeconomic outcomes in Belvar.
| Indicator | Keynesian forecast | Market-adjustment forecast | Observed outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Real GDP index | 97 | 94 | 98 |
| Unemployment rate / % | 8 | 10 | 7 |
Define Keynesian economics indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define Say’s law indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in Belvar’s real GDP index from Year 1 to Year 2.
Using Table 2, calculate the absolute real GDP forecast error for each school of thought in Year 2.
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain the Keynesian interpretation of Belvar’s recession (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how the infrastructure programme could increase Belvar’s output in the short run.
Using a loanable-funds diagram, explain the crowding-out concern described in Text A, paragraph 2.
Using a PPC diagram, explain how productive infrastructure could affect Belvar’s long-run output.
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate whether Belvar’s experience justifies a shift toward Keynesian economic thought.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Ordelia experienced persistently high inflation after rapid growth of bank credit and the money supply. Advisers influenced by the monetarist school recommended slower monetary growth and less frequent discretionary fiscal intervention.
New classical advisers also emphasized rational responses and market adjustment. They argued that predictable rules would influence expectations more effectively than repeated policy surprises.
The central bank adopted a money-growth target. Inflation subsequently fell, but global energy prices also declined and agricultural output recovered after a drought.
The government states that the outcome confirms the monetarist theory. Critics say a valid theory is supported by connected reasoning and evidence, but agreement with one prediction does not prove that it applies in every period.
Annual money-supply growth and inflation before and after the policy rule.
| Period | Money-supply growth / % per year | Inflation rate / % |
|---|---|---|
| Before the rule | 18 | 14 |
| After the rule | 7 | 6 |
Inflation forecasts, outcome, money-growth path and reported policy rate in Ordelia.
| Measure | Before target | After target |
|---|---|---|
| Money-supply growth / % | 18 | 7 |
| Policy interest rate / % (reported; not equilibrium) | 4 | 8 |
| Monetarist inflation forecast / % | — | 7 |
| Unchanged-policy inflation forecast / % | — | 10 |
| Observed inflation rate / % | — | 6 |
Define the monetarist school indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term theory indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in Ordelia’s inflation rate.
Using Table 2, calculate the absolute inflation forecast error for each forecast.
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how slower money growth may reduce demand-pull inflation (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using a money-market diagram, explain how contraction of money-supply growth could raise Ordelia’s interest rate (Table 2).
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how recovery of agricultural output could have reduced inflation (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a PPC diagram, explain how the end of the drought may affect Ordelia’s production possibilities.
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether Ordelia’s disinflation provides strong empirical support for monetarist policy.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
A large manufacturing company introduced robots, raising output per worker and profits. Classical microeconomic analysis emphasizes incentives, productivity and decisions at the margin.
A union influenced by Marxism argues that ownership of productive resources gives shareholders power over workers and that automation may intensify conflict over how income is distributed.
The company says higher productivity will eventually raise wages and create technical jobs. The union notes that production-worker employment fell and claims the evidence refutes the company’s prediction.
Economists caution that the outcome may differ between the short run and long run. They also distinguish measured inequality from equity, since deciding whether the resulting distribution is fair requires a normative standard.
Factory outcomes before and after automation in Karsia.
| Period | Annual output / units | Production workers | Average annual wage / kars |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before automation | $200,000 | $1,000 | $36,000 |
| After automation | $270,000 | $750 | $37,800 |
Distribution of factory income before and after automation.
| Income component | Before automation / million kars | After automation / million kars |
|---|---|---|
| Total wages | 36.00 | 28.35 |
| Profits | 24.00 | 40.65 |
Define Marxism indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).
Define the term equity indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage change in output per production worker following automation.
Using Table 2, calculate labour’s share of the combined wage-and-profit income after automation.
Using a labour-market diagram, explain the short-run effect of labour-replacing automation on production-worker employment (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a PPC diagram, explain how automation may affect Karsia’s productive capacity.
Using a Lorenz curve diagram, explain how a transfer of income from wages to profits could affect measured income inequality (Table 2).
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how higher investment in automation may affect real output in the short run.
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the usefulness of classical and Marxist economic thought for explaining the effects of automation in Karsia.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Novera requires lenders to state annual interest rates. A new pilot also presents the total repayment amount in large print and includes a comparison with a cheaper loan. Researchers studying framing and limited attention describe this as an application of behavioural economics.
The conventional model assumes consumers use available information to choose the loan that maximizes expected utility. Behavioural researchers do not claim that every borrower makes the same error.
High-cost borrowing fell in pilot branches. However, the pilot branches also received additional staff training, and borrowers may have differed from those elsewhere.
Consumer groups recommend national implementation. Lenders argue that prominent warnings may discourage beneficial emergency borrowing and that government-selected comparisons can influence choices according to official values.
Borrowing decisions before and after the disclosure change.
| Period | Loan applicants / number | High-cost loans chosen / number | Lower-cost loans chosen / number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before disclosure | 6000 | 2400 | 2100 |
| After disclosure | 6000 | 1500 | 3000 |
Repayment outcomes for a representative 1000-nover loan.
| Loan type | Average total repayment / novers (1000-nover loan) | Late-payment rate / % |
|---|---|---|
| High-cost loan | 1380 | 18 |
| Lower-cost loan | 1160 | 10 |
Define behavioural economics indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 1).
Define the term utility indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in the number of applicants choosing high-cost loans.
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage saving in total repayment from choosing the lower-cost rather than the high-cost loan.
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how clearer disclosure may affect demand for high-cost loans (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using a marginal benefit and marginal cost diagram, explain the conventional model of a borrower’s loan decision (Text A, paragraph 2).
Using an information-failure diagram, explain why borrowers may consume an excessive quantity of high-cost credit.
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how a large reduction in household borrowing could affect Novera’s real output in the short run.
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether Novera should make the behavioural lending disclosure compulsory nationwide.
Norland's energy ministry traditionally required households to apply actively for a renewable-electricity plan. Behavioural economists suggested changing the choice architecture so that households would be enrolled automatically but could opt out at no cost.
The ministry randomly assigned similar households to a control group, which retained active enrolment, and a treatment group, which received automatic enrolment. It hypothesized that the default would increase renewable-plan participation and reduce electricity consumption. Weather conditions and regulated electricity prices were similar for both groups during the trial.
Household trial outcomes before and during the three-month trial.
| Group | Households | Average electricity consumption before / kWh per household per month | Average electricity consumption during / kWh per household per month | Participation before / % | Participation during / % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 2 000 | 400 | 392 | 18 | 21 |
| Automatic enrolment | 2 000 | 420 | 357 | 19 | 68 |
The trial lasted three months. Some officials argue that the results refute the conventional assumption that households always choose plans using complete information and fully rational calculation.
Calculate the percentage decrease in the treatment group's average monthly electricity consumption.
Using a difference-in-differences method, determine the estimated effect of the automatic-enrolment policy on average monthly electricity consumption per household.
Define the term behavioural economics.
State a testable hypothesis concerning the effect of automatic enrolment on renewable-plan participation.
Explain why random assignment strengthens the ministry's test of the hypothesis.
Explain whether the trial refutes the conventional model of rational household choice.
Explain two limitations of using this trial to predict the nationwide effects of automatic enrolment.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend whether Norland should introduce automatic enrolment in renewable-electricity plans nationwide.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Arandia discards many electronic devices even when they could be repaired. The government piloted grants for community repair centres. Its objective was to keep products and materials in use, reduce the extraction of new resources and develop evidence about the most appropriate scale of the programme.
Economists estimated the total social benefit and total programme cost at three possible scales. These estimates include measured resource savings and administrative costs, but non-market environmental benefits are difficult to value.
Estimated annual social benefits and programme costs at alternative repair scales.
| Repair scale / devices per year | Total social benefit / arins | Total programme cost / arins |
|---|---|---|
| 1 000 | 90 000 | 60 000 |
| 2 000 | 170 000 | 130 000 |
| 3 000 | 225 000 | 210 000 |
Annual results of the repair-centre programme at the medium scale.
| Measure | Annual result |
|---|---|
| Devices accepted | 2 000 devices |
| Devices successfully repaired | 1 400 devices |
| Potentially replaceable virgin material identified | 1 200 kg |
| Virgin-material use avoided | 840 kg |
Using Table 2, calculate the percentage of accepted devices that were successfully repaired.
Calculate the percentage of potentially replaceable virgin material whose use was avoided.
Using Table 1, determine the programme scale supported by marginal analysis.
Define the term marginal analysis.
Explain how the repair programme is consistent with the concept of a circular economy.
Explain two assumptions underlying the estimates in Table 1.
Explain why the government's estimate of the preferred programme scale should remain open to revision.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend how the government of Arandia should develop its repair-centre programme.
Costavia entered a recession after a sharp fall in private expenditure. Economists influenced by classical ideas predicted that flexible markets would restore output without a large fiscal intervention. Keynesian economists argued that inadequate aggregate expenditure could keep the economy below full employment and supported temporary government spending.
The government introduced a one-year public investment programme at the beginning of Year 2. The programme was concentrated in regions with high unemployment.
Costavia's real output index and unemployment rate by year.
| Year | Real output index | Unemployment rate / % |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-recession year | 100 | 5 |
| Year 1 | 92 | 10 |
| Year 2 | 97 | 7 |
End-of-Year 1 forecasts for Year 2 in Costavia.
| Forecast approach | Real output index, Year 2 | Unemployment rate in Year 2 / % |
|---|---|---|
| Classical market-adjustment | 96 | 8 |
| Keynesian (with investment programme) | 98 | 6.5 |
Monetarist economists accepted that the recession was serious but warned that frequent discretionary intervention could create instability and weaken confidence. Government officials must decide whether to renew the investment programme for another year.
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in real output between the pre-recession year and Year 1.
Calculate the percentage increase in the real output index between Year 1 and Year 2.
Using Tables 1 and 2, calculate the absolute forecast error for Year 2 unemployment for each forecast.
Define the term Keynesian economics.
Explain how the recession challenged the proposition known as Say's law.
Compare the Keynesian and monetarist approaches to stabilization policy described in the stimulus.
Explain why the Year 2 evidence does not prove that the Keynesian explanation is universally correct.
Explain one way in which historical context can influence the development of economic thought.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend whether Costavia should renew the public investment programme for another year.
Estara has traditionally followed a linear pattern in which packaging materials are extracted, used and discarded. The government wants to encourage producers to design reusable packaging and introduced a one-year levy pilot. Revenue from the levy financed collection points and consumer reminders.
Before the pilot, economists constructed a model predicting how the levy would affect producer adoption of reusable packaging and annual packaging waste. The model assumed stable consumer preferences, material prices and production technology.
Packaging levy model predictions and pilot outcomes in Estara.
| Measure | Baseline | Model with levy | Pilot outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reusable-packaging adoption rate / % | 20 | 45 | 38 |
| Annual packaging waste / tonnes | $10,000 | $7,000 | $7,600 |
| Administrative cost / million estaras | — | 1.2 | 1.5 |
Consumer surveys conducted after the pilot found that reminders placed beside disposal bins increased returns of reusable packaging. Psychologists advising the government argued that limited attention and habits should be incorporated into the economic model.
Calculate the increase in the reusable-packaging adoption rate between the baseline and the actual pilot outcome, in percentage points.
Calculate the percentage increase in the reusable-packaging adoption rate between the baseline and the actual pilot outcome.
Calculate the percentage decrease in annual packaging waste between the baseline and the actual pilot outcome.
Calculate the absolute forecast error for annual packaging waste.
Define the term economic model.
Explain how the pilot evidence should affect the government's model.
Explain how dialogue with psychology could improve the economic analysis of the levy.
Explain the interdependencies between the economy, society and the environment illustrated by Estara's packaging policy.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend how the government of Estara should develop its packaging policy after the pilot.
Explain how value judgments may influence the selection and application of an economic model.
Using real-world examples, discuss whether the distinction between positive and normative economics can be maintained in policy debates.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Explain how the experience of the Great Depression contributed to the Keynesian challenge to classical macroeconomic thought.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that economic crises are the main cause of changes in economic thought.
Explain how monetarist and new classical thought challenged the Keynesian case for discretionary macroeconomic stabilization policy.
Using real-world examples, discuss whether the historical context in which an economic school of thought develops limits its relevance to current policy making.
Explain how the Marxist critique differed from classical economic thought in its interpretation of capitalism.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that individual economists are the main cause of paradigm shifts in economics.
Explain how interdependence between the economy, society and the natural environment provides a case for moving towards a circular economy.
Using real-world examples, discuss whether a transition towards a circular economy requires greater government intervention.
Build a Practice Exam — Economics HL
Test your knowledge with a custom paper containing questions from selected topics.


Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Elaria requires new public buildings to record components in digital “materials passports” so that steel, glass and timber can later be reused. The policy reflects awareness of interdependence between the economy, society and environment.
Economists constructed a model predicting material recovery. The model assumes stable demolition rates and unchanged prices for virgin materials. These assumptions simplify reality but allow a testable positive statement: the passport requirement will increase the recovery rate.
Recovery increased, although virgin steel prices also rose. Researchers therefore cannot isolate the policy’s effect with certainty. They recommend revising the model and collecting evidence from private construction.
The minister states that preserving resources for future generations is more important than minimizing present construction costs. This is a normative statement, even though evidence can estimate the costs and environmental benefits.
Construction-material availability and recovery before and after the materials-passport policy.
| Period | Reusable material available / tonnes | Material recovered / tonnes |
|---|---|---|
| Before policy | 80000 | 24000 |
| After policy | 90000 | 40500 |
Predicted and observed programme outcomes
| Outcome | Value |
|---|---|
| Predicted recovery rate | |
| Observed recovery rate | |
| Additional construction costs | 32 million elars |
| Estimated environmental benefits | 38 million elars |
Define a positive statement indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).
Define a normative statement indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in the quantity of construction material recovered.
Using Table 2, calculate the net estimated measurable benefit of the programme.
Using a negative externality of production diagram, explain why the use of virgin construction materials may result in market failure.
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how higher virgin-steel prices could increase demand for recovered steel (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using a PPC diagram, explain the present opportunity cost of devoting more resources to recovering construction materials.
Using a PPC diagram, explain how preserving finite resources could affect Elaria’s future production possibilities.
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate whether Elaria’s evidence justifies extending materials passports to private buildings.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Santorra previously followed policies influenced by classical ideas. Officials expected flexible prices and private exchange to direct food toward its highest-valued uses. After a crop failure, food prices rose sharply and malnutrition increased among households with low purchasing power.
The crisis led to proposals for public grain purchases, transfers and temporary price support. This illustrates how historical events may challenge an established paradigm, a broad framework shaping accepted questions and explanations.
Some economists recommend expanding food transfers until the additional social benefit equals the additional cost. This applies marginal analysis rather than comparing total benefits and costs alone.
Others argue that market exchange remains important for generating supply incentives. Behavioural researchers add that stress and limited attention may influence household choices during crises. Environmental researchers warn that intensive cultivation may damage soil and future output.
Food-market and social indicators before and after the crop failure in Santorra.
| Indicator | Annual staple consumption by lowest-income fifth / kg per household | Malnutrition rate / % |
|---|---|---|
| Staple-food price index | 100 | 160 |
| Annual staple consumption by lowest-income fifth [kg per household] | 300 | 225 |
| Malnutrition rate [%] | 12 | 21 |
Estimated marginal benefits and costs of successive food-transfer programme expansions.
| Programme expansion | Marginal social benefit / million santors | Marginal cost / million santors |
|---|---|---|
| Expansion 1 | 90 | 50 |
| Expansion 2 | 60 | 60 |
| Expansion 3 | 35 | 55 |
Define the term paradigm indicated in bold (Text A, paragraph 2).
Define marginal analysis indicated in bold (Text B, paragraph 1).
Using Table 1, calculate the percentage decrease in annual staple consumption by the lowest-income fifth.
Using Table 2 and marginal analysis, determine the programme scale Santorra should select.
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain the increase in Santorra’s staple-food price following the crop failure (Text A, paragraph 1).
Using a maximum-price diagram, explain how a binding food-price ceiling could affect the staple-food market.
Using a PPC diagram, explain how soil degradation could affect Santorra’s future productive capacity (Text B, paragraph 2).
Using a positive consumption externality diagram, explain why food transfers that improve child nutrition may generate social benefits beyond the recipient household.
Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss whether Santorra’s food crisis justifies a major shift away from market-oriented economic thought.