Master IB Chemistry S2.3: The metallic model with notes created by examiners and strictly aligned with the syllabus.
S2.3.1 Metallic bonding and the properties of metals
S2.3.2 Strength of metallic bonds
S2.3.3 Delocalized d-electrons in transition elements
A simple idea drives this topic: an element behaves more like a metal when its outer electrons can spread across many atoms instead of staying with one atom. Elements with low electronegativity usually have stronger metallic character because their valence electrons delocalize more readily. Across a period, metallic character generally decreases; down a group, it generally increases.
A metallic bond is an electrostatic attraction that acts between a lattice of positive metal ions and delocalized electrons. A lattice is a regular three-dimensional arrangement of particles that repeats through a solid. A cation is a positively charged ion formed when an atom loses one or more electrons. A delocalized electron is an electron that is not fixed between two particular atoms and can move through a larger structure.
In the metallic model, metal atoms give their outer-shell electrons to a mobile electron cloud. The particles left behind can be modelled as closely packed positive ions, with mobile electrons around them. The attraction is not drawn as one line between two atoms, as it often is in a simple covalent bond. It extends through the whole metallic structure.

Electrical conductivity is the ability of a material to allow electric charge to move through it. Metals conduct electricity because they contain mobile charged particles: the delocalized electrons. In an unstressed piece of metal, these electrons move randomly. Apply a potential difference, and there is a net movement of electrons through the metal towards the positive terminal.
That is why metals such as copper and aluminium work well in electrical wiring. The same property is less helpful if the metal is used as a handle for an electrical device, where insulation rather than conduction is needed. Link the use to the property, not just to the word “metal”.

Thermal conductivity is the ability of a material to transfer thermal energy through itself. Metals are good thermal conductors for two connected reasons. Their ions are closely packed, so vibrations can pass from one ion to the next. Their mobile delocalized electrons can also carry kinetic energy rapidly through the lattice after collisions with vibrating ions.
This explains why metals are used in saucepans, heat sinks and radiators: energy moves quickly from one region of the metal to another. It also explains why a metal spoon in hot soup soon feels hot at the handle. The particles have not travelled from the soup to your hand; energy has.
As temperature increases, the ions in a metal vibrate more vigorously. These vibrations interfere more often with the movement of delocalized electrons, so the electrical resistance of most metals increases with temperature. A superconductor is a material that has zero electrical resistance below a particular critical temperature. This is not the normal behaviour of metals at room temperature, but it’s a useful reminder that conductivity depends on particle behaviour, not on a label alone.

Malleability is the ability of a solid to be hammered or pressed into a new shape without shattering. Ductility is the ability of a solid to be drawn out into a wire. Both properties come from the non-directional nature of metallic bonding. The attraction acts between the whole array of cations and the surrounding delocalized electrons, not between one fixed pair of atoms.
When a force is applied, layers of metal ions can slide past each other. The delocalized electrons still surround the shifted ions, so the metallic bonding is maintained during deformation. An ionic crystal behaves very differently: sliding layers can bring like charges next to each other and cause the crystal to split.

Malleability makes aluminium useful for foil and car body panels. Ductility, combined with electrical conductivity, makes metals useful for cables. Real material choice also depends on strength, density, corrosion resistance and cost, so “metallic bonding” begins the explanation; it does not decide the whole design.
Lustre is the shiny appearance of a material caused by reflection of visible light from its surface. Metals are often lustrous because their delocalized electrons interact strongly with incoming light and re-emit it. Thin layers of metals such as silver or aluminium can therefore be used in mirrors and reflective coatings.
Characteristic metallic properties connect directly to uses:
| Property | Particle-level reason | Example use |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical conductivity | Mobile delocalized electrons carry charge | Copper or aluminium power cables |
| Thermal conductivity | Mobile electrons and close-packed ions transfer energy | Pans, heat sinks, radiators |
| Malleability | Layers of cations slide while bonding remains | Foil, panels, shaped containers |
| Ductility | Metallic structure can be stretched without bonds snapping | Wires, springs, strings |
| Lustre | Delocalized electrons reflect light | Mirrors, decorative finishes |
Measurable data support the metallic model. Useful experimental data include electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, melting point, boiling point, density, hardness and malleability. Collected across a period or down a group, these values show trends that can be compared with changes in atomic structure and bonding.
For period 3, sodium, magnesium and aluminium show metallic structures and high electrical conductivity. Silicon is a semiconductor with a covalent network structure, and the later elements are poor electrical conductors because they do not contain mobile delocalized electrons in a metallic lattice. Periodic data like these show the gradual change from metallic to non-metallic behaviour.
Period 3 changes from metallic to non-metallic character.
| Element | Classification | Structure type | Electrical conductivity | Electronegativity (Pauling) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na | Metal | Metallic lattice | High | 0.93 |
| Mg | Metal | Metallic lattice | High | 1.31 |
| Al | Metal | Metallic lattice | High | 1.61 |
| Si | Metalloid | Giant covalent network | Semiconductor | 1.90 |
| P | Non-metal | Simple molecular | Poor | 2.19 |
| S | Non-metal | Simple molecular | Poor | 2.58 |
| Cl | Non-metal | Simple molecular | Poor | 3.16 |
| Ar | Noble gas | Monatomic | Poor | Not assigned |
A sensible database investigation would start with a focused research question, such as how thermal conductivity changes down group 1 or how melting point changes across the metallic elements of period 3. The data set should be large enough to show a trend, values should come from a reliable database, and the same property should be compared under comparable conditions. Graphs help because they show whether a relationship is smooth, irregular or broken by a change in structure.
Reactivity trends of metals can also be predicted from the periodic table. For many s-block metals, reactivity increases down a group because the outer electron is farther from the nucleus and is lost more easily. Across a period from left to right, metals generally become less reactive as they hold their outer electrons more strongly. These reactivity trends concern electron loss, while the physical properties in this topic concern delocalized electrons in the solid metal. The ideas are connected, but they are not the same explanation.
Metallic bonding gets stronger when the attraction between the metal cations and the delocalized electrons is stronger. For this syllabus, keep it simple: stronger metallic bonding is favoured by higher cation charge, smaller metal ion radius and greater electron density in the delocalized electron cloud.
Ionic radius is the distance from the centre of an ion to the outer region of its electron cloud, usually compared in picometres or metres. If the metal ion is larger, its positive charge sits farther from the delocalized electrons, so the electrostatic attraction is weaker. A smaller metal ion lets the cation attract the electron cloud more closely.
Electron density is the amount of electronic charge present in a given volume of space. In a metal, more delocalized electrons per metal ion means a denser electron cloud, so the attraction to the cations is stronger.

Melting point is the temperature at which a solid and liquid are in equilibrium at a stated pressure. In metals, a higher melting point usually points to stronger metallic bonding, since more energy is needed to overcome enough attractions for the regular solid lattice to break down into a liquid.
It isn't a perfect one-factor test. Crystal structure and other details can affect the value. Still, for the s- and p-block metals in this topic, melting point is a very useful comparison.
In group 1, the cation charge stays the same: each metal forms a 1+ ion in the simple metallic model. Down the group, the metal ions get larger. The delocalized electrons are, on average, farther from the centres of positive charge, so the attraction weakens. The melting points therefore decrease down the group.
That is why lithium has a higher melting point than sodium, and sodium has a higher melting point than potassium. The trend is not because the atoms “contain more electrons” in a vague sense. What matters here is the increased distance between the cations and the delocalized electron cloud.

When you use data to make predictions, a graph of melting point against position in the group can make the trend easier to see. Extrapolation to rubidium or caesium needs care: a graph can suggest a value beyond the measured data, but the further you move outside the known range, the less secure the prediction becomes. A good evaluation compares the prediction with reliable data and comments on whether the pattern was close to linear or curved.
Across period 3, the metallic elements sodium, magnesium and aluminium show a strong increase in melting point from sodium to the other two metals. Three changes push the bonding in the same direction:
In this simple model, aluminium has stronger metallic bonding than magnesium because aluminium forms smaller, more highly charged cations and contributes more delocalized electrons per ion. Magnesium has much stronger metallic bonding than sodium for the same reasons, though the exact melting point comparison between magnesium and aluminium is close because real structures are more complicated than the model.
Period 3 metallic elements: factors linked to stronger metallic bonding.
| Metal | Cation charge | Ionic radius / pm | Deloc. e⁻ per atom | Melting point / °C | Boiling point / °C | Bond strength trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium (Na) | Na⁺, 1+ | 102 | 1 | 98 | 883 | Weakest |
| Magnesium (Mg) | Mg²⁺, 2+ | 72 | 2 | 650 | 1091 | Stronger |
| Aluminium (Al) | Al³⁺, 3+ | 54 | 3 | 660 | 2470 | Strongest |
Stronger metallic bonding usually gives higher melting points and often greater hardness or strength. That matters when choosing a metal for a demanding use. A cooking pan must not melt on a hob and must conduct heat well. A power cable must conduct electricity and be ductile enough to draw into long wires. A car body panel needs malleability and suitable strength. An artificial hip joint needs strength, low reactivity in the body and resistance to wear.
This is where chemistry turns into materials selection. One property rarely decides the use on its own. Metallic bonding explains many useful features, but cost, density, corrosion, abundance, toxicity and recyclability also influence the final choice.
An alloy is a metallic material made by combining a metal with one or more other elements. Metals can form alloys because metallic bonding is non-directional and the delocalized electrons can still hold a mixed lattice of particles together. Add atoms of a different size, and they disrupt the easy sliding of metal layers, often making the alloy harder than the pure metal. This link belongs fully to materials, but the essential feature starts here: mobile delocalized electrons can bind a lattice even when the lattice contains more than one type of atom.
A transition element is an element with atoms that have an incomplete d sublevel, or one that forms at least one ion with an incomplete d sublevel. Most d-block elements fit this definition, but not all of them do. Zinc is the standard classroom exception: Zn has a full 3d sublevel, and Zn²⁺ also has a full 3d sublevel, so zinc is not classified as a transition element by this definition.
You’ll meet the chemical properties of transition elements, such as variable oxidation states, coloured compounds and catalytic behaviour, elsewhere. This section stays with the physical side: metallic bonding, high melting point and electrical conductivity.
In transition elements, electrons from d sublevels can join the delocalized electron system, together with outer-shell electrons. That puts a high density of delocalized electrons around the positive metal ions. As a result, the attraction between the cations and the electron cloud is strong.
This strong metallic bonding is why many transition elements have high melting points compared with group 1 and group 2 metals. Tungsten, for example, is useful in very high-temperature applications because its metallic bonding is strong enough for the solid structure to persist at temperatures that would melt many other metals.

Transition elements conduct electricity well because they contain many delocalized electrons that can move when a potential difference is applied. The idea is the same as for any metal, with one added feature: delocalized d-electrons increase the number of mobile charge carriers available in the metallic structure.
That doesn’t mean every transition metal has the same conductivity. The lattice, temperature, impurities and electron arrangements all affect measured values. The model explains the general reason for conductivity, not every numerical detail.
Across the s- and p-block metals, changes in cation charge, radius and number of delocalized electrons often give clear broad trends in melting point. Across the d-block, the pattern is less smooth. The d sublevel is being filled, and the number of electrons participating in metallic bonding does not change in a simple one-electron-per-group way. Electron configurations, d-electron involvement and detailed crystal structures all influence the measured melting points.
So, when you look across a row of transition elements, don’t expect the neat sodium-to-magnesium-to-aluminium style of explanation to work as cleanly. The same metallic model still applies, but more variables are changing at once.
