Master IB Chemistry S2.1: The ionic model with notes created by examiners and strictly aligned with the syllabus.
S2.1.1 Formation of cations and anions
S2.1.2 Ionic bonds, names and formulas
S2.1.3 Ionic lattices and physical properties
An ion is a charged particle formed when an atom or group of atoms loses or gains electrons. In ordinary chemical ion formation, protons are not transferred, so the nuclear charge stays the same. The electron number changes.
A cation has fewer electrons than protons, giving it an overall positive charge. Metal atoms often form cations by losing electrons. A sodium atom, for example, has 11 protons and 11 electrons, while Na⁺ has 11 protons and 10 electrons, so its charge is 1+.
An anion has more electrons than protons, giving it an overall negative charge. Non-metal atoms often form anions by gaining electrons. A sulfur atom can gain two electrons to form S²⁻, the sulfide ion.

A monatomic ion is an ion made from a single atom. The names of monatomic anions usually end in -ide: chloride, oxide, sulfide, nitride and so on. Cation names usually stay the same as the element name. If a metal can form more than one charge, Roman numerals are used in compound names, such as iron(II) and iron(III).
An electron configuration is a notation that shows how electrons occupy shells, subshells and orbitals in an atom or ion. A useful rule at this level is that main-group atoms tend to form ions by reaching a noble gas electron configuration, as long as they can do it by losing or gaining a small number of electrons.
For cations, remove the outer-shell electrons. Sodium is 1s²2s²2p⁶3s¹, so losing the 3s electron gives Na⁺ with 1s²2s²2p⁶. Calcium is 1s²2s²2p⁶3s²3p⁶4s², so losing two 4s electrons gives Ca²⁺ with 1s²2s²2p⁶3s²3p⁶.
For anions, add electrons to complete the outer shell. Chlorine is 1s²2s²2p⁶3s²3p⁵, so gaining one electron gives Cl⁻ with 1s²2s²2p⁶3s²3p⁶. Oxygen is 1s²2s²2p⁴, so gaining two electrons gives O²⁻ with 1s²2s²2p⁶.
Isoelectronic species are atoms or ions with the same electron configuration. Na⁺ is isoelectronic with Ne; Cl⁻ and Ca²⁺ are isoelectronic with Ar. Don’t call them “the same particle”: they have different proton numbers and different charges.

The periodic table gives a quick way to predict many main-group ions:
| Periodic table group | Common ion charge | Reason in electron terms |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1+ | loses 1 outer electron |
| 2 | 2+ | loses 2 outer electrons |
| 13 | 3+ | loses 3 outer electrons |
| 15 | 3− | gains 3 electrons |
| 16 | 2− | gains 2 electrons |
| 17 | 1− | gains 1 electron |
| 18 | usually none | already has a full outer shell |
Group 14 is awkward if you try to force the rule. Carbon would have to lose or gain four electrons to make C⁴⁺ or C⁴⁻, which is not usually favourable. Carbon more commonly shares electrons in covalent compounds.
The octet rule is a model stating that many atoms form bonds so that their valence shell contains eight electrons. It works well for many main-group ions, but it is a model, not a law. Hydrogen, for example, can lose one electron to form H⁺ or gain one electron to form H⁻, reaching the helium configuration rather than an octet.

Oxidation is a chemical process in which a species loses electrons. Cation formation is oxidation: Na → Na⁺ + e⁻.
Reduction is a chemical process in which a species gains electrons. Anion formation is reduction: Cl + e⁻ → Cl⁻.
That is why forming an ionic compound from its elements is a redox reaction. During the formation of sodium chloride, sodium atoms lose electrons and chlorine molecules gain electrons:
2Na(s) → 2Na⁺ + 2e⁻
Cl₂(g) + 2e⁻ → 2Cl⁻
Oxidation-state language comes later in the course, but it fits the same idea: sodium goes from 0 to +1, while chlorine goes from 0 to −1.
A transition element is an element that has an atom or common ion with a partially filled d subshell. Unlike most main-group metals, transition elements often form more than one cation. Iron, for example, commonly forms Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺.
When first-row transition elements ionize, they lose the 4s electrons before the 3d electrons. So Fe, often written [Ar]4s²3d⁶, forms Fe²⁺ as [Ar]3d⁶. More electrons can then be removed because the 4s and 3d subshells are close in energy, which helps explain variable oxidation states.
Successive ionization energy data support this pattern: for transition elements, several electrons can often be removed with comparatively gradual increases before a much larger jump appears when an inner-shell electron would have to be removed.

This links back to periodic position. Main-group ion charges are closely tied to group number because atoms gain or lose electrons to reach a noble gas configuration. Transition elements are harder to predict from group number alone, because the ns and (n−1)d electrons are similar enough in energy for several cation charges to be possible.
An ionic bond is the electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions in a compound. Don’t picture it as a tiny stick joining one cation to one anion. The attraction acts through the whole structure, which matters a lot when lattices come up.
A chemical bond is a strong attractive interaction that holds atoms or ions together in a substance. In the ionic model, the cation is the positively charged species, and the anion is the negatively charged species.

Electronegativity, χ, is a dimensionless measure of how strongly an atom in a covalent bond attracts the shared pair of electrons, where χ is the electronegativity value on the Pauling scale and has no unit. It generally increases across a period and up a group; fluorine has the highest value.
The electronegativity difference, Δχ = |χ₁ − χ₂|, where Δχ is the difference in electronegativity between two bonded atoms (no unit), χ₁ is the electronegativity of one atom (no unit) and χ₂ is the electronegativity of the other atom (no unit), is often used to estimate ionic character.
A larger Δχ gives a bond more ionic character. As a working guideline, bonding is mainly ionic when Δχ is greater than about 1.8. Treat that as a model, not a rule that never fails. Bonding lies on a continuum, so “metal + non-metal” is a good first guess, but it does not guarantee ionic behaviour. Aluminium chloride, AlCl₃, is the standard warning example because its properties are more covalent than you might expect from the element types alone.

A binary ionic compound is an ionic compound containing ions of two elements only. Write the cation first, then the anion. For a monatomic anion, take the end of the element name and add -ide.
Examples:
| Formula | Ions present | Name |
|---|---|---|
| NaCl | Na⁺ and Cl⁻ | sodium chloride |
| MgO | Mg²⁺ and O²⁻ | magnesium oxide |
| Al₂S₃ | Al³⁺ and S²⁻ | aluminium sulfide |
| Ca₃N₂ | Ca²⁺ and N³⁻ | calcium nitride |
The name does not directly give the number of ions. “Magnesium fluoride” is MgF₂, not magnesium difluoride, because ionic compound names do not use covalent prefixes such as mono-, di- and tri-.
For transition metals with variable charges, the Roman numeral shows the oxidation state of the metal ion. In iron(III) oxide, iron is present as Fe³⁺, so the formula is Fe₂O₃. In copper(II) chloride, copper is Cu²⁺, so the formula is CuCl₂. The symbol charge is written as 2+ or 3+ after the number; the oxidation state is written as +2 or +3 with the sign first. Keep those formats separate.
A polyatomic ion is an ion composed of two or more covalently bonded atoms with an overall charge. When writing ionic formulas, treat a polyatomic ion as one charged unit: you may need brackets, but you must not change the atoms inside the ion.
| Polyatomic ion | Formula |
|---|---|
| ammonium | NH₄⁺ |
| hydroxide | OH⁻ |
| nitrate | NO₃⁻ |
| hydrogencarbonate | HCO₃⁻ |
| carbonate | CO₃²⁻ |
| sulfate | SO₄²⁻ |
| phosphate | PO₄³⁻ |
Required polyatomic ions, with formulas and overall charges.
| Ion name | Formula | Charge |
|---|---|---|
| ammonium | NH₄⁺ | +1 |
| hydroxide | OH⁻ | −1 |
| nitrate | NO₃⁻ | −1 |
| hydrogencarbonate | HCO₃⁻ | −1 |
| carbonate | CO₃²⁻ | −2 |
| sulfate | SO₄²⁻ | −2 |
| phosphate | PO₄³⁻ | −3 |
Polyatomic anions such as nitrate, carbonate, sulfate and phosphate are conjugate bases of acids. Their stability is connected to the acid dissociation constant, Kₐ, where Kₐ is the acid dissociation constant (mol dm⁻³ under the usual IB concentration convention). In general, a more stable conjugate base corresponds to a larger Kₐ for its conjugate acid, because acid dissociation is more favourable.
For sulfate, later work on formal charge helps explain which Lewis structure is preferred. Formal charge is a bookkeeping method for assigning electrons in a Lewis structure; the preferred sulfate representation gives the most reasonable distribution of formal charges while respecting the bonding model being used.
An ionic compound is electrically neutral overall. So the total positive charge must equal the total negative charge. That’s the key idea.
A reliable method is:
For magnesium chloride, Mg²⁺ needs two Cl⁻ ions to balance the charge, so the formula is MgCl₂.
For aluminium oxide, Al³⁺ and O²⁻ balance in a 2:3 ratio, because 2 × 3+ gives 6+ and 3 × 2− gives 6−. The formula is Al₂O₃.
For barium hydroxide, Ba²⁺ needs two OH⁻ ions. Since hydroxide is polyatomic and there is more than one of it, the formula is Ba(OH)₂. Do not write BaO₂H₂; that destroys the ion identity.
For ammonium phosphate, NH₄⁺ and PO₄³⁻ balance as three ammonium ions for one phosphate ion, giving (NH₄)₃PO₄.

To go from formula to name, identify the ions, then name the cation followed by the anion:
| Formula | Name |
|---|---|
| RbF | rubidium fluoride |
| Sr(OH)₂ | strontium hydroxide |
| BaCO₃ | barium carbonate |
| NH₄HCO₃ | ammonium hydrogencarbonate |
To go from name to formula, don’t guess subscripts from the words. Use the ion charges:
| Name | Ions | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| lithium nitride | Li⁺, N³⁻ | Li₃N |
| sodium sulfide | Na⁺, S²⁻ | Na₂S |
| aluminium nitrate | Al³⁺, NO₃⁻ | Al(NO₃)₃ |
| barium hydrogencarbonate | Ba²⁺, HCO₃⁻ | Ba(HCO₃)₂ |
Formation of an ionic compound from its elements is a redox reaction because a metal atom is oxidized to a cation while a non-metal atom is reduced to an anion. The ionic formula you write is the charge-balanced result of those electron-transfer processes.
An ionic lattice is a three-dimensional repeating arrangement of cations and anions held together by electrostatic attractions. In a crystal of sodium chloride, there aren’t separate NaCl molecules. The whole crystal is one continuous array of Na⁺ and Cl⁻ ions.
An empirical formula is a chemical formula showing the simplest whole-number ratio of particles in a substance. We use empirical formulas for ionic compounds because the formula shows the ion ratio in the lattice, not a separate molecular unit. NaCl shows a 1:1 ratio of Na⁺ to Cl⁻. MgCl₂ shows a 1:2 ratio of Mg²⁺ to Cl⁻.

Ionic bonding is non-directional, meaning each ion attracts surrounding oppositely charged ions in all directions. So ionic substances build extended lattices, rather than small pairs of ions.
Lattice enthalpy, ΔH°_lattice, is the standard enthalpy change when one mole of solid ionic lattice is separated into its gaseous ions, where ΔH°_lattice is the lattice enthalpy (kJ mol⁻¹). For a simple 1:1 salt:
MX(s) → M⁺(g) + X⁻(g) ΔH°_lattice > 0
This process is endothermic, since energy must be supplied to overcome the attractions between ions. Some sources define lattice enthalpy for the reverse process: lattice formation from gaseous ions, which has a negative sign. Always check the definition being used. In IB data booklet work, lattice enthalpy is treated as the energy needed to separate the lattice into gaseous ions.

Stronger ionic attractions give a larger lattice enthalpy. The two main factors are:
Selected ionic lattices showing how shorter ion distance and larger charge product give higher lattice enthalpy.
| Compound | Ion charges | Approx. ion distance / pm | Charge product |z₊z₋| | Lattice enthalpy / kJ mol⁻¹ | Main comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KF | K⁺, F⁻ | 271 | 1 | 821 | larger ions, lower value |
| NaF | Na⁺, F⁻ | 235 | 1 | 923 | smaller cation, higher value |
| NaCl | Na⁺, Cl⁻ | 283 | 1 | 790 | single charges |
| MgO | Mg²⁺, O²⁻ | 212 | 4 | 3795 | higher charges, much higher value |
A useful investigation is to collect lattice enthalpy and ionic radius data for a series such as the group 1 chlorides, enter them in a spreadsheet, and plot lattice enthalpy against cation radius. The expected pattern is a decrease in lattice enthalpy down the group as the cation radius increases. If charge density is calculated, the same idea appears in a different form: smaller ions with the same charge have higher charge density and stronger attractions.
Volatility is the tendency of a substance to vaporize. Ionic compounds are usually non-volatile because many strong electrostatic attractions have to be overcome before ions can separate into the gas phase. For the same reason, ionic compounds usually have high melting and boiling points.
Here, lattice enthalpy links directly to properties. A higher lattice enthalpy usually means stronger ionic bonding and therefore a higher melting point, as long as the bonding type is genuinely comparable.
Across period 3 metal chlorides, charge alone does not explain the trend in melting points. Lattice enthalpies and the bonding continuum both matter. Sodium chloride and magnesium chloride are largely ionic, so their strong lattices give relatively high melting points. Aluminium chloride has more covalent character, so its melting point is much lower than a purely ionic model would predict. It’s a good reminder that models overlap rather than sit in separate boxes.
Melting points of selected period 3 metal chlorides compared with bonding character.
| Chloride | Bonding character | Melting point / °C | Ionic-model interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| NaCl | Largely ionic | 801 | Strong ionic lattice gives a high melting point. |
| MgCl₂ | Largely ionic | 714 | Strong lattice attractions keep the melting point high. |
| AlCl₃ | More covalent | 192 | Lower melting point shows the ionic model is less suitable. |
Electrical conductivity is the ability of a substance to allow charge to flow. A substance conducts electricity only if it contains charged particles that are free to move.
Solid ionic compounds do not conduct electricity. They contain ions, but those ions are fixed in lattice positions and can only vibrate. The charged particles are present; they just aren’t mobile.
Molten ionic compounds do conduct electricity because melting breaks the rigid lattice arrangement, allowing the ions to move. Aqueous ionic solutions also conduct if the compound dissolves, because the separated hydrated ions can move through the water.

The experimental data are straightforward: compare conductivity readings for a solid salt, the molten salt, pure water and an aqueous salt solution. The solid gives little or no conductivity. The molten and aqueous samples give much higher conductivity because mobile ions are present.
Solubility is the extent to which a solute dissolves in a solvent to form a solution. Many ionic compounds dissolve in polar solvents such as water, but not in non-polar solvents such as hexane.
Water is polar: oxygen carries a partial negative charge, while the hydrogen atoms carry partial positive charges. When an ionic crystal is placed in water, water molecules orientate themselves around the ions. The oxygen end points toward cations, and the hydrogen ends point toward anions. If these ion–water attractions are strong enough to overcome the attractions within the lattice, ions leave the lattice and become hydrated.

Not all ionic compounds are soluble in water. Calcium carbonate and silver chloride are familiar examples of low-solubility ionic compounds. In these cases, the lattice attractions are too strong relative to the attractions between ions and water molecules.
A precipitate is an insoluble solid that forms when two solutions are mixed and ions combine to make a low-solubility compound. Precipitation reactions give useful qualitative data for ionic compounds: if an initially clear mixture turns cloudy or forms a solid, an insoluble ionic product has formed.

When collecting solubility data, small-scale drop tests on a clear sheet over a dark background are enough to see precipitates clearly. Safety still matters: wear eye protection, treat unknown ionic solutions as irritants, and collect heavy-metal precipitates for proper disposal rather than washing them down the sink.
Typical experimental evidence for ionic properties includes:
| Property being tested | Data or observation expected for many ionic compounds | Explanation from the ionic model |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility | high melting/boiling point; little evaporation at room temperature | strong attractions in the lattice |
| Conductivity as solid | very low conductivity | ions are fixed in position |
| Conductivity molten/aqueous | much higher conductivity | ions are mobile |
| Solubility in water | many dissolve; some form precipitates or remain insoluble | competition between lattice attractions and ion–water attractions |