The student has successfully based their TOK exhibition on one of the 35 prompts released by the IBO, specifically addressing the question, "How can we judge when evidence is adequate?" They have effectively presented three specific objects, each accompanied by a commentary that adheres to the word limit, and clearly identified their real-life contexts. The student has demonstrated that all chosen objects pre-existed the assessment and have provided sufficient evidence and clear references for each statement made regarding the prompt. However, the commentary lacks explicit justification for how each object contributes to the exploration of the prompt, which is a necessary element for clarity. Overall, the exhibition maintains relevance and precision, supporting the exploration of the adequacy of evidence.
