The student presents a clear title at the beginning of the TOK essay and maintains a sustained focus on it throughout, discussing relevant anomalies in natural science and art without digression. The work effectively links different Areas of Knowledge, providing convincing real-life examples that support the argument about the dismissal of anomalies. The student demonstrates awareness of various points of view and evaluates differing approaches towards anomalies, considering implications and counterpoints in both natural science and art. However, the essay could improve its critical nature by ensuring that arguments are explicitly linked to the Areas of Knowledge before presenting examples. Overall, the organization of the essay is well-structured, and all external sources are properly acknowledged.
