The student effectively divided the work into sections, including an introduction, body, and conclusion, with clear indications of each section. However, the body of the work was not further subdivided to clearly indicate phases of exploration. The topic of the internal assessment was clearly stated and explained in the introduction, and the general approach to the topic and its relevance to the math curriculum was well described. The conclusion, while accurately summarizing the findings, did not fully respond to the aim stated in the introduction. The logical linking of consequent parts of the work was well executed, and the use of technology, including analytical software, was clearly indicated and explained. However, the placement and description of graphs, tables, and diagrams were not always appropriate, and there were issues with referencing information outside the syllabus scope and centering mathematical formulae and calculations. Finally, the document met formatting requirements, such as font size, spacing, and justification, and did not contain unnecessary or repetitive calculations, graphs, or descriptions.
