The student clearly describes and explains the research design, detailing the use of an independent measures design and random allocation to mitigate individual differences. The sampling technique is also well articulated, with convenience sampling employed to select participants based on accessibility, supported by the context of participant scarcity. Relevant characteristics of the participants, including their age, gender, and ethnic backgrounds, are effectively stated, along with a justified exclusion of psychology students to prevent bias. The student identifies controlled variables and provides sound reasoning for their control, ensuring consistency and reliability in the results. However, the student does not clarify the importance of each material used in the methodology, which could enhance the understanding of their relevance to the research objectives.
Additionally, the student could provide details in the 'procedure' section, specifically explaining how informed consent was communicated, rather than simply stating that participants were asked to "sign the consent form." They should also include information about the debriefing process to highlight its importance. It is also recommended to avoid statements like," left them in a worse state," which could be misleading.
