The student fulfilled the criterion of dividing the work into sections: introduction, body, and conclusion. The body was further subdivided into phases, such as "Data collection," "Model 1," and "Model 2," with a clear progression of ideas. However, the introduction lacked a clear description of the topic and mathematical components, and the conclusion did not provide numerical values obtained in the work. The exploration was not always clear and understandable, as indicated by the overlapping figures and lack of logical linkage between parts. Additionally, there were issues with the presentation of graphs and tables, and the placement of large tables. Despite these shortcomings, the use of technology was clearly indicated and explained, and the exploration met the length and formatting requirements. The student also referenced all information outside of the syllabus scope and centered all mathematical formulae, equations, and calculations. Overall, while there were areas for improvement, the IA demonstrated engagement with the topic and a commitment to integrating external research.
