The student has effectively divided the work into sections, including an introduction, body, and conclusion. The body of the work is appropriately subdivided to indicate different phases of the exploration. In the introduction, the student clearly stated the aim and provided a general description of their approach to the topic, as well as the area of the math curriculum the exploration focuses on. However, the conclusion did not effectively summarize the findings and answer the aim of the study as required. The use of technology was clearly indicated and explained, but the purpose of analytical software used was not described, and a citation was missing. The student effectively incorporated graphs, tables, and diagrams in appropriate places and ensured that the exploration fell within the required page range. Additionally, the student referenced all information outside of the syllabus scope and ensured that all mathematical formulae, equations, and other calculations were centered. The pages were numbered as per the guidelines, and there were no unnecessary or repetitive calculations, graphs, or descriptions.
