The student divided the exploration into sections, including an introduction, body, and conclusion. The body of the work is further subdivided into phases of the exploration. However, the topic of the investigation is not clearly stated in the introduction. The introduction includes a general description of the student's approach to the topic and what area of the math curriculum the exploration focuses on. The conclusion is a summary of the outcomes and a response to the aim of the exploration stated in the introduction. The exploration is generally clear and understandable, although there are some linguistic errors that make it hard to understand at times. The consequent parts of the work are linked logically. The student indicated the use of technology (geogebra software) when applied, but no analytical software is used. The graphs, tables, and diagrams are present in appropriate places, with a short explanation and purpose indicated before each. The exploration is 16 pages long, excluding the bibliography and appendices. However, the font used is not consistent, and the text is not justified. The student used footnotes to reference information outside of the syllabus, but the citation method is not correct. Not all calculations are equally centered, and the notation is inconsistent. The pages are numbered correctly in the bottom right corner, excluding the title page. However, there are some unnecessary and repetitive calculations, graphs, and descriptions included in the exploration.
