The student's oral presentation is predominantly analytical, focusing on the interpretation and analysis of features and authorial choices from the extracts and works. The analysis is insightful and directly relevant to the topic, as the student has explored materialistic lifestyles portrayed in both works, discussing elements such as satisfaction, livelihood, and morality. However, there are areas for improvement, as the student could have provided more specific features within the extracts. Additionally, the evaluation of features or authorial choices based on their effectiveness in conveying the global issue and evoking reactions in the reader/viewer could have been more thorough. Finally, while the form of one of the sources is analyzed, the form of the other source is not explored, which was a point for further development.
