The student's oral presentation is predominantly analytical, focusing on the interpretation and analysis of features or authorial choices from the extracts. They correctly identify and directly quote several features or authorial choices from the works, and interpret them with respect to the global issue, such as mental health and societal perceptions. However, the analysis lacks insight and direct relevance to the topic, as the student should have delved deeper into the communication of the global issue and the reaction evoked in the audience. Additionally, the student did not effectively evaluate the features based on their effectiveness in conveying the global issue and the audience's reaction, and failed to analyze the form of the extracts' sources or works, which could have enriched the overall analysis.
