The student describes an appropriate scenario for investigation for an identified client, including the client's identity, the problem to be solved, and a proposed solution. The rationale for choosing the proposed product is explained and justified. Additionally, the student provides a range of appropriate criteria for evaluating the success of their product. However, the evidence of consultation for the investigation is not adequately provided, and the rationale seems to come solely from the student without reference to consultation with the client and/or advisor. It would have been beneficial for the student to include proof of consultation to demonstrate mutual understanding and consent between the student and the client, overseen by the advisor.