The student included three supporting documents in the work, fulfilling the requirement for three to five supporting documents. However, the student did not clearly label each supporting document, which could have been done by providing a clear label next to each supporting document stating "supporting document (number)". Additionally, the student did not attach the supporting documents to the work and therefore no highlights were provided. The supporting documents are relevant and sufficiently in-depth, providing both qualitative and quantitative information concerning the chosen topic. They also provide a range of ideas and views regarding the topic, focusing on different topics and coming from different publishers, enhancing the consideration of multiple perspectives. However, the student did not provide an assessment of the validity and reliability of the supporting documents, which could have been included in the methodology by commenting on the reliability and potential bias of the sources, as well as exploring the validity by considering their date of publication.
